Iraq WMD Claim by Cheney
Richard B. Cheney | White House | August 26, 2002
Audio (mp3)
"Simply stated, there is no doubt that Saddam
Hussein now has weapons of mass destruction. There
is no doubt he is amassing them to use against our
friends, against our allies, and against us." —
Richard B. Cheney View file [30.1kb]
AUDIO:
http://www.why-war.com/files/Cheney_WMD_claim.mp3
The Untold Story of the Cheney 'Quagmire' Video
Washington Post, United States - 8 hours ago
When he found it in the archives, the producer was
just looking for something mildly interesting to
help fill the 12-hour Cheney marathon planned by
C-SPAN ...
Video Surfaces of Cheney, in 1994, Warning That An
Invasion of ... Lancaster Newspapers
Cheney YouTube Clip Reveals Massive Dem Failure
Huffington Post
all 8 news articles »
Cheney On Iraq In 1994: "Quagmire"
Follow link to watch YouTube Clip
Dick Cheney had a different view of invading Iraq in
1994, as evident in this discussion of the first
Iraq war, a war where he was the Secretary of
Defense.
After you take down Saddam Hussain's government, he
asks, "then what are you gonna put in its place?
That's a very volatile part of the world, and if you
take down the central government in Iraq, you can
easily end up seeing pieces of Iraq fly off... it's
a quagmire ... if you try to take over Iraq... How
many additional American causalities was Saddam
worth? Our judgment was not very many, and I think
we got it right."
Today Vice President Cheney is viewed as one of the
chief architects of the war and its chief apologist.
The interview is available at YouTube, where it was
posted five days ago and has been viewed more than a
half-million times; LiveLeak, where it was posted
four days ago and has been viewed about 28,000
times; as well as at YouTube, where it was posted
today and has been viewed almost a half-million
times. It appears to have originally been posted by
GrandTheftCountry.
Editor&Publisher notes that the interview "first
appeared on C-SPAN and was re-aired last week on
C-SPAN 3."
This is better than the MemoryHole. I'm waiting for
the original copyright owner (C-SPAN) to scream foul
and demand that YouTube take down the clip.
http://uspolitics.about.com/b/a/208177.htm
==========================================
The evil Dick Cheney
Dick Cheney is evil. There is a bit of evil in most
human beings, but in Cheney it is easy to spot,
although most people don't have the guts to say it.
...
MORE:>>
I have mixed feelings about attempts to impeach
Dubya Bush. Sure, I want to see this
liar/thief/hypocrite exposed as the traitor he is
and driven from office as Nixon was, never again to
utter a simplistic "dead or alive" comment in public
again.
But then, we'd be officially stuck with Dick Cheney
as the main man in the White House, although many
believe he already is. And that would be worse than
having Bush in that position. My dream scenario
would be a re-enactment of Watergate, where the vice
president is forced to resign before the president
follows suit. Add to that the resignation of Scalia,
Ashcroft and Rumsfeld, and I'd start believing that
God does have more than a superficial effect on our
political process. Thank you, Jesus, thank you,
Lord.
Cheney's list of sins is as long as any Republican's
transgressions. As CEO of Dallas-based Halliburton
Co. from 1995 until 2000, Cheney did little about
cleaning up asbestos in his buildings, leading to
multimillion-dollar legal judgments against
Halliburton. He presided over several rounds of job
cuts, including about 11,000 workers in 1999, a year
that Halliburton showed a $438 million profit. Since
those layoffs, Halliburton's profits rose to $501
million in 2000 and $809 million in 2001.
Halliburton also raked in big bucks from dubious
deals with Iraq under Cheney's tenure, according to
the Washington Post and other sources. From 1997
through 2000, Cheney's Halliburton sold $73 million
worth of oil equipment and services to Iraq through
subsidiaries Dresser-Rand and Ingersoll Dresser Pump
Co. to help rebuild Iraq's Gulf War-damaged
infrastructure. That was more business than any
other U.S. company, and Cheney later lied about his
Iraqi connection to media types like Sam Donaldson.
Talk about corporate hypocrisy. Companies like
Halliburton could make big profits on such oil
deals, but human rights groups could not ship
life-saving medicine to Iraqi children because of UN
sanctions. And now, Cheney the Major League
Hypocrite is standing in line to nuke Hussein after
he profited - big time - from Iraq. Halliburton also
did business with dictatorships that have committed
human rights abuses, such as in Burma, Libya and
Iran. In fact, Houston-based Kellogg Brown & Root, a
Halliburton subsidiary, was fined $3.8 million for
exporting U.S. goods to Libya in violation of U.S.
sanctions. Cheney did nothing to stop such fraud.
Brown & Root also had to pay a hefty fine after
being accused of defrauding the U.S. military by
submitting false claims for delivery orders between
1994 and 1998. Again, Cheney did nothing to stop
such fraud. Halliburton was a corporate welfare hog
under Cheney, obtaining at least $3.8 billion in
federal contracts and taxpayer-insured loans,
according to the Center for Public Integrity. All
the while, Cheney blasted welfare mothers.
Then there is Halliburton's Enron-like accounting
scheme under Cheney's watch. The dishonest
accounting policies, adopted in 1998, were obviously
designed to make it appear that Halliburton had more
revenues than the firm actually did. Specifically,
Halliburton labeled unresolved claims against some
clients as revenue, even though the money was still
disputed, including $234 million in 2001 and $89
million in 1998. And who was Halliburton's
accountant? Andersen, of course- the same firm
embroiled with Enron. Cheney was even featured in an
Andersen video, saying "I get good advice, if you
will, from their people based upon how we're doing
business and how we're operating - over and above
just the sort of normal by-the-books auditing
arrangement." Sounds like a confession to me. Even
with such phony accounting, Halliburton's stock
nose-dived below $10 in early 2002 after being as
high as $49 last year. The stock has since gone up
slightly. The SEC is investigating, but do you
really expect anything to come of that?
There is a wide trail of lies told by Cheney. There
is the Iraqi connection, the Enron ties, the India
deal, the so on and so on. Cheney also lied about
not living in Texas as late as November 2000 in
apparent violation of the 12th Amendment to the U.S.
Constitution. He didn't sell his Dallas-area mansion
to a major Republican donor until Nov. 30, 2000,
according to deed records. I have been by that $2.7
million home several times since Cheney sold it and
have never seen any evidence anyone occupying it.
The owner, Dianne T. Cash, owns another
million-dollar home in Highland Park, one of the
wealthiest suburbs in the country. So, she needs two
mansions in the same tiny suburb, huh? From Sept.
2000 until June 2001, Cash - an appropriate name for
a Republican, right? - gave a whopping $229,433 to
national Republican organizations, in addition to
buying Cheney's house, according to federal records.
Interestingly, she also gave $1,000 to Democrat Bill
Bradley in 1999 - her only contribution to a
Democrat since then. Was that a ploy to foil Gore?
Surely, this staunch Republican did not embrace
Bradley's proposals, which were more liberal than
Gore's.
Another lie concerns another basic piece of public
information with a paper trail: Cheney's Texas
driver's license. Dick's license is still active but
lists his address as 500 N. Akard Street in Dallas,
which is where he worked at Halliburton, not his
home on Euclid Avenue in Highland Park. Lynne
Cheney's driver's license lists the same Akard
address. Texas law requires residency addresses to
be placed on licenses. Even someone as paranoid as
billionaire H. Ross Perot - remember his weird
reason for getting out of the 1992 presidential
election because the Bush campaign supposedly
planned to disrupt his daughter's wedding? - has his
home address, not work address, on his Texas
driver's license. Even Bush listed the Texas
governor's mansion - which was where he lived and
goofed off, er, worked - on his license. Other high
profile politicians - such as former Dallas Mayor
Ron Kirk, who is running as a Democrat for U.S.
Senate, and his Republican challenger, Attorney
General John Cornyn - list their home addresses, not
work. Why were both Cheneys allowed to be above the
law, once again?
That is another pattern in Cheney's - and Bush's -
life, getting perks most others do not. As a tyrant,
Cheney expects preferential treatment. He thinks
nothing of holding closed-door White House meetings
with Enron executives to discuss public energy
policies. He is surprised when some question why
such public meetings are allowed to be private. He
thinks nothing of using public tax money to fly to
India to demand that they pay a private company,
Enron, a loan. He is surprised when some accuse him
of abusing his office.
Let me say it because most will not: Dick Cheney is
evil. There is a bit of evil in most human beings,
but in Cheney it is easy to spot, although most
people don't have the guts to say it. I especially
hate it when I see Cheney on some Sunday morning
media show talking like he's an authority figure and
no one has the guts to question him. Can't they see
through his BS? Granted, it's not as easy to see
through as Bush's, who gives new meaning to the
word, "shallow."
That's not to say Bush and Cheney are stupid; on the
contrary, they know how to use people and cleverly
turn things to their advantage. Bush's father's CIA
background is apparent; in the CIA, you are trained
to lie, to twist and to show different faces. That's
what spies do. That's why I cannot understand
someone like The Nation's John Nichols, who wrote an
excellent book called Jews for Buchanan: Did You
Hear the One About the Theft of the American
Presidency?, actually saying he thinks Bush is a
decent, nice guy. Nichols, who said that during an
interview earlier this year with Internet radio host
Meria Heller, should know better. Bush is trained to
be nice to the media, to project a nice-guy public
image. It gets him votes. That's what he cares
about. Same with Mr. Big Time, Cheney.
Bush's and Cheney's real personas are closer to the
one where they did the major-league-asshole-big-time
routine on New York Times journalist Adam Clymer
during the 2000 campaign. Remember, these are people
who thought nothing of trashing their own - war vet
John McCain - with a below-the-belt smear campaign
in South Carolina. These are people who thought
nothing of trashing the Constitution and people's
voting rights in 2000. These are people who thought
nothing of using the legal system to not count legal
votes as they trashed anyone who used that same
legal system to attempt to gain some justice. These
are people who thought nothing of getting a federal
court to intervene in a state matter as they called
for the federal government to stay out of state
matters. I could list more hypocrisies here, but
that's enough, for now.
Anyways, Cheney is smarter, more experienced, and
more dangerous than Bush. He's known as the enforcer
on Capitol Hill, with his office known as the
torture chamber. There is a reason for those
nicknames, and it's not something I would be proud
of, but Cheney probably is. It's obvious Cheney
really thinks Bush is a lightweight and deals more
with Bush Sr., who is running more of this show than
many think. Cheney's CIA connections are long,
including with his private firms and Defense
Department position. He knows how to put on his spy
costume and routine as well as Bush, probably
better. Cheney is evil, I tell you. There's no other
way to put it, in my book.
The media, most of whose members are as intimidated
by Cheney as the major Democratic politicians, just
continues to protect Cheney. A mid-June Associated
Press article on Lynne Cheney's return to Dallas to
promote a children's book - well, isn't that
special? - said only that she and Dick "lived in the
Dallas suburb of Highland Park in the 1990s when he
was the head of Halliburton Co., an oil field
services company." No way, AP. The Cheneys lived
there in 2000, too.
But it's good to see some in the mainstream media
aren't quite as intimidated. In June, Business Week
pointed out how the White House was "compromised at
this juncture in history by its once-incestuous
relationship with Enron. The recent revelations of
aggressive accounting techniques at Halliburton, one
of the world's largest providers of products and
services to the energy industry, during Vice
President Dick Cheney's tenure as CEO doesn't help
either." That relatively mild criticism is about as
strong as the mainstream media gets against Cheney.
I'm at a loss at what to do about confronting
Cheney's evil. I'm not sure essays like this one
accomplish much, beyond getting something off my
chest and on the record. Congress does not have the
guts to impeach Bush, much less Cheney. The
mainstream media is too corporate-controlled these
days to pull another 1970s Watergate, when the media
was a real force, a force that compelled me to jump
aboard the profession. How disillusioned can I be?
Maybe Cheney will be hit with another heart attack.
And I sure won't be sad. When Reagan acquired
Alzheimer's during the last year or so of his reign,
I wasn't sad or surprised. I suspected Reagan had
Alzheimer's during most of his term. And if another
medical problem fells Cheney or Bush chokes for good
on another pretzel, that's poetic justice, I say.
It's the only kind of justice we will get in this
case, I'm afraid.