Neocons Judith Miller and Karl Rove:
Sun Jul 3, 2005 14:10
64.140.158.86
Saturday - 2 July 2005 - Mark@Bruzonsky.com
Neocons Judith Miller and Karl Rove:
http://www.blogwashington.com/
Neocon Reporter Judith Miller is loving it. All the deflecting attention about how she is protecting confidential sources as if she is some kind of first-amendment crusader.
The actual realities are quite different. Miller, working with and through the hard-line Israeli-centric Washington Neocons quite willingly allowed herself to be used by one of the biggest hucksters of modern-times, Ahmed Chalabi, to continually front-page fearmonger in the complicitous NYTimes about the non-existent Iraqi Weapons of Mass Destruction and 'terrorism connections'. She and her great but seriously compromised newspaper of record have never come clean about this; and probably never will.
Another reality which will soon, finally, be leaking out further in Washington because of the confidential sources investigation, is that it was non-other than White House Rasputin Karl Rove himself who outed former deep-cover CIA operative Valerie Plame.
But don't expect the powers that be in Washington to really do anything about Rove. And don't expect the NYTimes to do anything about Miller...or about how it allowed itself so easily to become a significant part of the Pentagon/Ahmed Chalabi/U.S. propaganda war machine.
If there were accountability and justice in today's Washington Karl Rove would be indicted, for what he did and which is about to come out, actually broke a law protective undercover CIA operatives, and Miller, rather than being promoted to cover the United Nations would be demoted or fired. But as this recent investigation of her concludes: "Why top management at an institution that is normally fierce about staff errors [that's the New York Times of course] continues to tolerate this is a continuing mystery."
And it's a little bit of a mystery as well that the author of this very insightful article, Russ Baker, and his U.N.-based 'international community' news organization, refuse to investigate the 'mystery' they claim to have uncovered. If they would it would take them in directions, and into subjects, it appears they prefer to not deal with. And that is, to be specific, Ms. Miller's long-time connections to various groups and personalities connected with the 'Israeli-jewish lobby' and how they have used her to plant stories, and she them to further her 'investigative' credentials, for quite some time. Furthermore, and helping a great deal to explain how the NYTimes has handled Ms. Miller, these are connections the NYTimes not only is aware of, but in many cases in many fudgeably and always carefully indirectly and deniable ways, it shares.
Meanwhille, fully half of Americans now believe Bush purposefully lied to bring about the Iraq invasion/occupation.
57% believe the Iraq War was 'Not Worth It'. And 42% believe if the President lied about the war he should be impeached!.
http://www.blogwashington.com/
Cooper Documents Reveal Karl Rove as Source in Plame Case
By Greg Mitchell*
Editor, EDITOR & PUBLISHER
http://www.middleeast.org/premium/read.cgi?category=Magazine&num=1295&month=7&year=2005&function=text&standalone=0
NEW YORK - 2 July 2005 - Now that Time Inc. has turned over documents to federal court, presumably revealing who its reporter, Matt Cooper, identified as his source in the Valerie Plame/CIA case, speculation runs rampant on the name of that source, and what might happen to him or her. Friday night, on the syndicated McLaughlin Group political talk show, Lawrence O'Donnell, senior MSNBC political analyst, claimed to know that name--and it is, according to him, top White House mastermind Karl Rove.
Today, O'Donnell went further, writing a brief entry at the Huffington Post blog:
"I revealed in yesterday's taping of the McLaughlin Group that Time magazine's e-mails will reveal that Karl Rove was Matt Cooper's source. I have known this for months but didn't want to say it at a time that would risk me getting dragged into the grand jury.
"McLaughlin is seen in some markets on Friday night, so some websites have picked it up, including Drudge, but I don't expect it to have much impact because McLaughlin is not considered a news show and it will be pre-empted in the big markets on Sunday because of tennis.
"Since I revealed the big scoop, I have had it reconfirmed by yet another highly authoritative source. Too many people know this. It should break wide open this week. I know Newsweek is working on an 'It's Rove!' story and will probably break it tomorrow."
Here is the transcript of O'Donnell's McLaughlin Group remarks:
"What we're going to go to now in the next stage, when Matt Cooper's e-mails, within Time Magazine, are handed over to the grand jury--the ultimate revelation, probably within the week of who his source is.
"I know I'm going to get pulled into the grand jury for saying this but the source of...for Matt Cooper was Karl Rove, and that will be revealed in this document dump that Time magazine's going to do with the grand jury."
Other panelists then joined in discussing whether, if true, this would suggest a perjury rap for Rove, if he told the grand jury he did not leak to Cooper.
Besides his career at a TV journalist, O'Donnell has served as a producer and writer for the series "The West Wing."
According to published reports, Patrick Fitzgerald, the special prosecutor in the case, has interviewed President Bush and Vice President Cheney and called Karl Rove, among others, to testify before the grand jury.
"The breadth of Fitzgerald's inquiry has led to speculation that it has evolved into an investigation of a conspiracy to leak Plame's identity," the Chicago Tribune observed on Friday, "or of an attempt to cover up White House involvement in the leak."
Cooper and New York Times reporter Judith Miller, held in contempt for refusing to name sources, tried Friday to stay out of jail by arguing for home detention instead after Time Inc. surrendered its reporter's notes to a prosecutor.
Miller argued that it was pointless to imprison her because she will never talk. She submitted letters from soldiers and military officers with whom she was embedded during the war in Iraq attesting to that. (Miller's pre-war coverage of Iraqi weapons of mass destruction has drawn much criticism.)
She asked the judge for "very restrictive home detention," if confined at all, including an electronic bracelet and excluding Internet access and cellular phones. As an alternative, she asked to be sent to the federal prison camp for women in Danbury, Conn.
Meanwhile, on Capitol Hill, Sen. Frank Lautenberg, D-N.J., said Friday that several unidentified Senate Republicans had placed a hold on a proposed resolution declaring support for Miller and Cooper.
``Cowards!'' Lautenberg said of the Republicans. ``Under the rules, they have a right to refuse to reveal who they are. Sound familiar?''
Lautenberg's resolution is co-sponsored by Sens. Richard Lugar (R-Ind.) and Christopher Dodd (D-Conn.) It says no purpose is served by imprisoning Miller and Cooper and that the First Amendment guarantees freedom of the press.
Greg Mitchell (letters@editorandpublisher.com ) is editor of E&P.
2003 Story in The Guardian Pointing at Karl Rove
http://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,12271,1053191,00.html
Neocons Judith Miller and Karl Rove:
http://www.blogwashington.com/
Neocon Reporter Judith Miller is loving it. All the deflecting attention about how she is protecting confidential sources as if she is some kind of first-amendment crusader.
The actual realities are quite different. Miller, working with and through the hard-line Israeli-centric Washington Neocons quite willingly allowed herself to be used by one of the biggest hucksters of modern-times, Ahmed Chalabi, to continually front-page fearmonger in the complicitous NYTimes about the non-existent Iraqi Weapons of Mass Destruction and 'terrorism connections'. She and her great but seriously compromised newspaper of record have never come clean about this; and probably never will.
Another reality which will soon, finally, be leaking out further in Washington because of the confidential sources investigation, is that it was non-other than White House Rasputin Karl Rove himself who outed former deep-cover CIA operative Valerie Plame.
But don't expect the powers that be in Washington to really do anything about Rove. And don't expect the NYTimes to do anything about Miller...or about how it allowed itself so easily to become a significant part of the Pentagon/Ahmed Chalabi/U.S. propaganda war machine.
If there were accountability and justice in today's Washington Karl Rove would be indicted, for what he did and which is about to come out, actually broke a law protective undercover CIA operatives, and Miller, rather than being promoted to cover the United Nations would be demoted or fired. But as this recent investigation of her concludes: "Why top management at an institution that is normally fierce about staff errors [that's the New York Times of course] continues to tolerate this is a continuing mystery."
And it's a little bit of a mystery as well that the author of this very insightful article, Russ Baker, and his U.N.-based 'international community' news organization, refuse to investigate the 'mystery' they claim to have uncovered. If they would it would take them in directions, and into subjects, it appears they prefer to not deal with. And that is, to be specific, Ms. Miller's long-time connections to various groups and personalities connected with the 'Israeli-jewish lobby' and how they have used her to plant stories, and she them to further her 'investigative' credentials, for quite some time. Furthermore, and helping a great deal to explain how the NYTimes has handled Ms. Miller, these are connections the NYTimes not only is aware of, but in many cases in many fudgeably and always carefully indirectly and deniable ways, it shares.
Meanwhille, fully half of Americans now believe Bush purposefully lied to bring about the Iraq invasion/occupation.
57% believe the Iraq War was 'Not Worth It'. And 42% believe if the President lied about the war he should be impeached!.
http://www.blogwashington.com/
Cooper Documents Reveal Karl Rove as Source in Plame Case
By Greg Mitchell*
Editor, EDITOR & PUBLISHER
http://www.middleeast.org/premium/read.cgi?category=Magazine&num=1295&month=7&year=2005&function=text&standalone=0
NEW YORK - 2 July 2005 - Now that Time Inc. has turned over documents to federal court, presumably revealing who its reporter, Matt Cooper, identified as his source in the Valerie Plame/CIA case, speculation runs rampant on the name of that source, and what might happen to him or her. Friday night, on the syndicated McLaughlin Group political talk show, Lawrence O'Donnell, senior MSNBC political analyst, claimed to know that name--and it is, according to him, top White House mastermind Karl Rove.
Today, O'Donnell went further, writing a brief entry at the Huffington Post blog:
"I revealed in yesterday's taping of the McLaughlin Group that Time magazine's e-mails will reveal that Karl Rove was Matt Cooper's source. I have known this for months but didn't want to say it at a time that would risk me getting dragged into the grand jury.
"McLaughlin is seen in some markets on Friday night, so some websites have picked it up, including Drudge, but I don't expect it to have much impact because McLaughlin is not considered a news show and it will be pre-empted in the big markets on Sunday because of tennis.
"Since I revealed the big scoop, I have had it reconfirmed by yet another highly authoritative source. Too many people know this. It should break wide open this week. I know Newsweek is working on an 'It's Rove!' story and will probably break it tomorrow."
Here is the transcript of O'Donnell's McLaughlin Group remarks:
"What we're going to go to now in the next stage, when Matt Cooper's e-mails, within Time Magazine, are handed over to the grand jury--the ultimate revelation, probably within the week of who his source is.
"I know I'm going to get pulled into the grand jury for saying this but the source of...for Matt Cooper was Karl Rove, and that will be revealed in this document dump that Time magazine's going to do with the grand jury."
Other panelists then joined in discussing whether, if true, this would suggest a perjury rap for Rove, if he told the grand jury he did not leak to Cooper.
Besides his career at a TV journalist, O'Donnell has served as a producer and writer for the series "The West Wing."
According to published reports, Patrick Fitzgerald, the special prosecutor in the case, has interviewed President Bush and Vice President Cheney and called Karl Rove, among others, to testify before the grand jury.
"The breadth of Fitzgerald's inquiry has led to speculation that it has evolved into an investigation of a conspiracy to leak Plame's identity," the Chicago Tribune observed on Friday, "or of an attempt to cover up White House involvement in the leak."
Cooper and New York Times reporter Judith Miller, held in contempt for refusing to name sources, tried Friday to stay out of jail by arguing for home detention instead after Time Inc. surrendered its reporter's notes to a prosecutor.
Miller argued that it was pointless to imprison her because she will never talk. She submitted letters from soldiers and military officers with whom she was embedded during the war in Iraq attesting to that. (Miller's pre-war coverage of Iraqi weapons of mass destruction has drawn much criticism.)
She asked the judge for "very restrictive home detention," if confined at all, including an electronic bracelet and excluding Internet access and cellular phones. As an alternative, she asked to be sent to the federal prison camp for women in Danbury, Conn.
Meanwhile, on Capitol Hill, Sen. Frank Lautenberg, D-N.J., said Friday that several unidentified Senate Republicans had placed a hold on a proposed resolution declaring support for Miller and Cooper.
``Cowards!'' Lautenberg said of the Republicans. ``Under the rules, they have a right to refuse to reveal who they are. Sound familiar?''
Lautenberg's resolution is co-sponsored by Sens. Richard Lugar (R-Ind.) and Christopher Dodd (D-Conn.) It says no purpose is served by imprisoning Miller and Cooper and that the First Amendment guarantees freedom of the press.
Greg Mitchell (letters@editorandpublisher.com ) is editor of E&P.
2003 Story in The Guardian Pointing at Karl Rove
http://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,12271,1053191,00.html
