Media: Bush, Blair, and Bumiller

Media: Bush, Blair, and Bumiller
Posted by: downing on Wednesday, June 08, 2005 - 10:24 AM
By David Swanson, www.afterdowningstreet.org
http://www.afterdowningstreet.org/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=103&mode=thread&order=0&thold=0

The corporate media today began its coverage of the Downing Street Minutes, moved to do so by a visit to Washington by Prime Minister Tony Blair, and by the pressure all of us have applied.
And, while most newspapers simply reported what Bush and Blair said, the USA Today, Houston Chronicle, Boston Globe, Columbus Dispatch, and Salon called www.AfterDowningStreet.org for comments. The articles are posted and linked to on our site.

And the Washington Post provided a lengthy and quite interesting chat on its website with staff writer Jefferson Morley, also available via www.afterdowningstreet.org .

But the Post's Dana Milbank declared the story over, having apparently mistaken a starting pistol for a fatal shot.

Here's what he wrote:
http://www.afterdowningstreet.org/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=101

Here's how to politely tell him he's mistaken:
[We've removed Milbank's Email address at his request. He claims that he meant the silence was ending, not the story. Read his article and judge for yourself.]

The New York Times' Elisabeth Bumiller published the following piece of stenography:
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/06/08/international/08prexy.html

This puts into new light Bumiller's famous comment that "You can't just say the president is lying. You don't just say that...."

From a panel broadcast on C-Span:
http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=2481

Bumiller: That's why it's very hard to write those, because you can't say George Bush is wrong here. There's no way you can say that in the New York Times. So we contort ourselves up and say, Actually” I actually once wrote this sentence: Mr. Bush's statement did not exactly . . . It was some completely upside down statement that was basically saying he wasn't telling the truth. And I got an email from somebody saying, What's wrong with you guys? Why can't you just say it plainly? But there's just”

Loren Ghiglione (Medill School of Journalism, Moderator): Why can't you say it plainly?

Bumiller: You can't just say the president is lying. You don't just say that in the . . . you just say”

Ghiglione: Well, why can't you?

[laughter from the audience]

Bumiller: You can in an editorial, but I'm sorry, you can't in a news column. Mr. Bush is lying? You can say Mr. Bush is, you can say. . . .

[Murmuring and laughter continue from audience.]

Bumiller [to audience]: And stop the fussing! You can say Mr. Bush's statement was not factually accurate. You can't say the president is lying”that's a judgment call.

How to politely ask Bumiller to report the truth even if it requires analyzing facts and making judgments:
bumiller@nytimes.com
http://www.afterdowningstreet.org/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=103&mode=thread&order=0&thold=0

-----------------
Leak-Gate Part 1
Flash Player
http://www.apfn.org/flash/leakgate1.swf

The Smoking Gun: The Downing Street Memo (Minutes)
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2087-1593607,00.html
http://www.downingstreetmemo.com/memo.html

Meet the Press, online at MSNBC - Transcript for April 10 2005

... And the WMD Commission has found out things that we ... is that the CIA's intelligence on Iraq was faulty almost from start to finish, never mind Curveball. ...

George Galloway vs. The US Senate
movie clip & transcript
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/Galloway.htm

IMPEACHMENT TIME: "FACTS WERE FIXED."
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/leakgate_impeachment.htm

Intelligence Identities Protection Act of 1982 (50 U.S.C. 421 et seq.)
(governing disclosures that could expose confidential Government agents)
http://foi.missouri.edu/bushinfopolicies/protection.html

Click to subscribe to LEAK-GATE
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LEAK-GATE/join