UNANIMOUS TREASON
By Charlotte Iserbyt
May 12, 2005
http://www.newswithviews.com/iserbyt/iserbyt24.htm
The U.S Senate's unanimous vote on the REAL ID card is a tragedy for our
nation. What an abuse of the U.S. Constitution! Ghastly news.
This neat little package says we won't be able to open a bank account, board a
plane or bus or drive a car without one. And just wait until the deliberately
dumbed down socialist bureaucrats have finished with writing the
regulations!!!!!!
The unanimous vote by the Senate shows they have been "unanimously" dumbed
down. "Deliberately" in order to take our country down. The majority of our
elected officials have never read the Constitution and its Bill of Rights,
and, sadly enough, if one even mentions that old relic to them, they don't
seem to care or take it seriously.
Had this legislation been voted on separately, there is a big possibility it
would not have passed since the vote on it was close in the House. How is it
possible that such a very important piece of legislation, designed to affect
all Americans and their offspring forever, had little or no discussion? How
deceitful, disgusting, manipulative for the Senate to have attached it to a
military appropriations bill which dealt with the important issue of funding
the needs of our servicemen and women. Do we really believe our young people
serving abroad are going to be happy when they return to a country that tracks
its citizens as is done in totalitarian countries? Surely they will ask
"exactly what have we been fighting for?"
Why couldn't the Senators who opposed this totalitarian internal passport, and
there were quite a few, have said they were going to vote "no" on the whole
package unless the internal passport provision was removed from the military
appropriation? That might have forced the Senate's hand and allowed two
separate votes on these two very separate issues. This writer heard via C-SPAN
two Democrat Senators, Reid from Nevada and Nelson from Florida, speak
strongly against the sneaky way it was going to be voted on, but unfortunately
they went along and voted with the rest of the dumbed down.
Is it any wonder Senators Snowe and Collins, ME, have refused to tell me, over
a period of two years, the truth about exactly who helped design this internal
passport? Former KGB Chiefs Primakov and Karpov, who were involved, must be
laughing on their way to the international socialist government planned by
Lenin, Stalin, Gorbachev, et al.
If these Senators (all 100 of them!) represent the views of their
constituents, one must assume that our nation has gone stark, raving, mad.
the deliberate dumbing down of america
Charlotte Thomson Iserbyt, former Senior Policy Advisor in the US Department
of
Education, blew the whistle on government activities.
HTTP://www.deliberatedumbingdown.com/
=========================
"I am a mercenary".
-- Bill O'Reilly
------------------------------------------
O'Reilly misleadingly claimed Real ID Act passed Senate 100-0
As proof that "politicians are finally feeling the heat on the illegal
[immigrant] issue," Fox News host Bill O'Reilly misleadingly claimed that the
"the Real ID Act passed 100-0 in the Senate." In fact, the Senate never held a
vote specifically on "the Real ID Act," which requires states to verify that
an applicant is a legal resident of the United States before issuing the
applicant a driver's license. Rather, the legislation was attached to the
emergency supplemental appropriation bill for military operations in Iraq and
Afghanistan. The only way to vote against the ID measure would have been to
vote against the entire funding bill.
House Judiciary Committee Chairman F. James Sensenbrenner (R-WI) originally
introduced the bill as part of the House's intelligence community reform
package in late 2004. When opposition to the provisions in the Senate
threatened to kill that bill, the provisions were dropped, but the House
leadership agreed to reattach them "to the first piece of legislation this
session that both chambers were expected to pass" [Los Angeles Times,
1/27/05]. The Real ID Act was reintroduced in 2005 and passed the House, but
apparently recognizing that the stand-alone bill lacked support in the Senate,
the House leadership attached the legislation to the House version of the
emergency funding bill. The Senate version did not include the measure. With
bipartisan support, Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) introduced an amendment
expressing the sense of the Senate that the provisions should not be in the
final bill, but the amendment was ruled "non-germane" and denied a voted. Most
of the Real ID provisions in the House's version survived the House-Senate
conference committee and were part of the conference report that passed the
House and Senate.
During the Senate debate on the final version of the bill, several senators
voiced opposition to the inclusion of the Real ID provisions in the conference
report, but this opposition was not reflected in the final vote of 100-0. Here
are some excerpts from the debate:
* Sen. Lamar Alexander (R-TN): "That does not stop me from objecting and
expressing my disappointment to two provisions in the bill. One is the
so-called Real ID Act. Actually, unlike a lot of legislation we pass here,
this is well named. This really is a national identification card for the
United States of America for the first time in our history. We have never done
this before, and we should not be doing it without a full debate. This Real ID
provision turns 190 million driver's licenses, which are now ineffective ID
cards, into more effective national identification cards. To add insult to
injury, we have also slapped state governments with the bill for them. I
strongly object to this. When I was governor of Tennessee, I vetoed our state
ID card twice because I thought it was an infringement on civil liberties. I
thought that driver's licenses are for driving. If we need an ID card, we
should have an ID card."
* Sen. Lincoln Chafee (R-RI): There are many concerns I have with Real ID in
addition to the process used to bring it to the floor. First, the measure is
an unfunded mandate to the states. Furthermore, unless every state complies,
the federal government will have to mandate the creation of a national ID.
Between the creation of a new database and approval system, training for DMV
[Department of Motor Vehicles] workers, and struggling state budgets, Real ID
will impose real costs. More importantly, a database of this type will open up
many privacy concerns and there must be security safeguards in place to
prevent the gathered information from being obtained inappropriately. Many
states, including Rhode Island, have already passed legislation setting their
own requirements for driver's license recipients. The federal government
should not impinge upon the states' ability to decide who can and cannot drive
on their roads, especially without the funding to support the idea. Real ID
will put more drivers on the road without licenses and without insurance."
* Sen. Robert Byrd (D-WV): "Mr. President, there were some problems in
conference, most notably the recessing at the call of the chair and not
returning, which left some of our members unable to offer motions. During the
recess, 55 pages of modified Real ID immigration legislation were inserted
into the conference report, sight unseen, by the conferees. Now, can you
imagine that? That would not have happened when I was chairman of the
Appropriations Committee. That would not have happened when I was majority
leader of the Senate. I will tell you, I don't blame our chairman or any
committee members for this situation, but I do acknowledge that there were
problems."
* Sen. Joseph I. Lieberman's (D-CT) floor statement: "I do want to note,
however, my strong objections to House provisions known as the Real ID Act
that have been included in the conference report. The Real ID Act will repeal
ID security provisions enacted with overwhelming bipartisan support last year
at the urging of the 9/11 Commission and place them with rigid and unworkable
federal mandates on state government for the issuance of driver's licenses,
long exclusively a matter of state law."
* Sen. Russell Feingold (D-WI): "My vote in support of this conference report
also comes with serious reservations because it contains the extremely
troublesome immigration and driver's license provisions of the Real ID Act,
which the House passed as an amendment to this bill. I strongly support
efforts to curb illegal immigration and to prevent terrorists from entering
our country to do harm. But as we work to secure our borders and protect our
nation from future terrorist attacks, we must also respect the need for
refugees, foreign workers, family members, students, businesspeople, visitors,
and others who wish to come to our nation legally. The Real ID Act is a big
step in the wrong direction. The new restrictions on immigration in the Real
ID Act are not necessary to protect national security. Rather, they will only
serve to create serious and unjustified hardships for people fleeing
persecution and for other non-citizens."
From the May 12 edition of Fox News' The O'Reilly Factor:
O'REILLY: But in Washington, the politicians are finally feeling the heat on
the illegal issue, as the Real ID Act passed 100-0 in the Senate. The
president will sign it into law shortly. Real ID would require all states to
see the birth certificates of anyone applying for driver's licenses. The
intent is to keep licenses out of the hands of illegals.
— R.S.K.
Posted to the web on Friday May 13, 2005 at 12:05 PM EST
Copyright © 2004-2005 Media Matters for America. All rights reserved.
----------------------------------------------
Real ID Act has problems
The Olympian - Olympia,WA,USA
... a public hearing or public input of any kind, the Senate has passed a bill
that will ... The provision was part of the Real ID Act of 2005, a seven-page
...
See all stories on this topic
Real ID Act spurs real concerns
Florida Today - Melbourne,FL,USA
... The Real ID Act will build a platform for this kind of database. Passed by
the Senate on Tuesday without debate, the bill was attached to an $82 billion
...
See all stories on this topic
Will National ID Cards Make Us More Secure?
CSO - Framingham,MA,USA
... On Tuesday, the Senate unanimously passed the Real ID Act ... Those in
support of the bill, such as sponsor Rep ... The Real ID act was part of an
unrelated $82 billion ...
US bill borders on environmental hypocrisy
Environmental Data Interactive - UK
... The new bill is expected to be passed now that the Senate has agreed to
include the so-called "Real ID" Act as a legislative rider to the Supplemental
...
See all stories on this topic
Let legislators make driver`s license law
El Diario New York - NY,USA
... REAL ID Act was approved by the Senate on Tuesday ... the US In a mean
twist, the REAL ID provision was ... to an $82 million emergency military
spending bill for the ...
See all stories on this topic
New Restrictions Draw Angry Response from Mexico
Inter Press Service (subscription) - World
... The so-called Real ID Act requires applicants for a driver's ... a
must-pass emergency funding bill for military ... unanimously approved by the
US Senate on Tuesday ...
Main Page -
Monday, 05/16/05
Message Board by American
Patriot Friends Network [APFN]
APFN MESSAGEBOARD
ARCHIVES
