Moussaoui's Wild Post-Plea Statement

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Moussaoui's Wild Post-Plea Statement
Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2005 23:50:15 -0400
From: mpwright9@aol.com
To: apfn@apfn.org

Moussaoui's guilty plea hearing was as strange as everything
else which has gone on in this entire court proceeding.

First he pled guilty to all the counts in the indictment, which
alleged that he participated in the 9/11 plot. Then right
afterwards he said that he was not part of the 9/11 plot,
but was going to hijack an aircraft at a later time, in order
to make demands for the freedom of Sheikh Omar Abdel
Rahman. His exact words (after the guilty plea) :

http://i.cnn.net/cnn/2005/images/04/23/moussaoui.plea.transcript.pdf

"I came to the United States of America to be part, okay,
okay, of a conspiracy to use airplane as a weapon of mass
destruction...but this conspiracy was a different conspiracy
than 9/11.

"My conspiracy has for aim to free Sheikh Omar Abdel
Rahman, Sheikh Omar Abdel Rahman, the blind sheik, who
is held in Florence, Colorado, okay, and we wanted to use
the 747 because it is a long-distance plane who could
reach Afghanistan without any stopover to give a chance
to special forces to storm the plane.

"So I am guilty of a broad conspiracy to use weapon of
mass destruction to hit the White House if the American
government refuse to negotiate, okay."

The above statement is entirely nonsensical. The reason is
that the terrorists would first have to be in possession of the
hijacked aircraft, in order to make demands on the President
for the release of Rahman. Conceivably, the demands could
be communicated by cell phone, from the air, after the aircraft
had been hijacked.

So what if the President said "Sure, we'll give you Rahman --
just please don't crash the plane into the White House."

Then what?

The aircraft has to be landed by the terrorists in order to
pick up Rahman and give him a lift to Afghanistan. Was
Moussaoui thinking that, in that situation, he would face
no danger of special forces storming the plane?

Is he that dumb? Mentally impaired? The man remains
an enigma.

One thing that is interesting, though, is that Moussaoui did
indicate that he intended to hijack an aircraft and then
make demands while presenting threats about what would
happen if the demands weren't met. According to the famous
August 6 memo from the CIA to the White House, this is what
Tenet (along with mentor David Boren) was expecting the
hijackers to do.

I have been hammering on this point for months, because
I suspect that Boren, Tenet, and David Edger let the hijacking
plot go forward because they were planning to do exactly
what Moussaoui feared -- storming the hijacked aircraft on
the ground to overwhelm the terrorists in order to make a
hero out of Boren and set him up for his lifelong dream --
a Presidential race.

Michael Wright
Norman, Oklahoma
http://www.bushbusiness.com/Wright_OP.htm

--------------------------

The Jawa Report: Moussaoui to Admit to 9/11 Role
... might have to wait some time before Moussaoui's role in 9/11 is clarified.
... Moussaoui had used Berg's laptop several times to email ???
MORE:>>

-----------------------------

Nick Berg + 911 + OKC Bombing Connection:
... ZACARIAS MOUSSAOUI AND LET HIM USE HIS (BERG) COMPUTER AND HIS PASSWORD. ...
A chronology of events leading up to 9/11 by Jim Crogan ...
http://www.apfn.org/NickBerg/connection.htm

Berg Was Arrested Twice at Oklahoma Univ in Spring 2000
... crosses one's mind that Berg might have been the one who bought the 9/11 ...
that the password and Berg's email address were on [Zacharia] Moussaoui's ...
http://www.apfn.org/NickBerg/arrested.htm