OKC BOMBING - STATE REP. CHARLES KEY AND GLENN WILBURN

APRIL 20TH... CHARLES KEY - NAMES, NAMES;
http://www.911busters.com/OKCB/MP3/OKCB_Charles_Key_.mp3

STATE REP. CHARLES KEY AND GLENN WILBURN

Glenn Wilburn and State Rep. Charles Key are two men who have had the courage to make public many of the facts which totally contradict the government/mass media's version of the Oklahoma bombing. Charles Key and Glenn Wilburn collected over 13,000 signatures of Oklahoma residents. The result is that a Grand Jury was empanelled in July, and is still investigating the facts along with eyewitness testimony.

Here are some exerts from a March 12, 1997 letter from Charles Key, which shows the relentless and totally unwarranted smear campaign he had to endure at the hands of the media, when all he wanted to do was to see that justice is done.

Charles Key says:

At some point it became painfully apparent that there was more wrong than right with the federal investigation. That is when I had a very tough decision to make. Should I sit and do nothing and remain in my comfort zone simply "playing the part" of the caring politician for the photo op's? Or should I really do the right thing even if it meant giving the phrase "politically incorrect" a whole new dimension?

Major media has launched unheard of attacks against our desire to conduct constitutionally sound and proper investigations. The Daily Oklahoman and the Tulsa World have published nine separate editorials viciously attacking me, Glenn Wilburn and all those who have stood up and demanded all of the truth about this terrible crime.

An editorial from the Daily Oklahoman entitled, "DROP IT, MR. KEY even had the audacity to say; "As we argued when Key first set out on this course, the Legislature and its staff had no business investigating the bombing. It was, and is, poorly equipped to do so. The same can be said of a panel of local citizens" . . .

People in powerful positions have repeatedly attacked those of us who have been scrutinizing the federal investigation. Oklahoma Governor Frank Keating was a former FBI agent himself and spent most of his career in the services of Federal Departments of the Treasury, Justice and HUD (Housing and Urban Development). At one time in his career his responsibilities included the overseeing of the ATF and other federal law enforcement. Gov. Keating went so far as to say that "raising questions would not bring one whit of intelligence to the process." He later escalated his attacks saying those of us who were raising serious questions were "howling at the moon" and "off the reservation."

THE TRIAL OF MCVEIGH-ANYONE FOR A LYNCHING?

McVeigh is certainly implicated in the Oklahoma City bombing, but to what degree has yet to be ascertained. The government has served him up to an eager public, but thus far he seems little more than a Lee Harvey Oswald clone. He may of been cast, unwittingly, in the "leading role" by the government. One fact is certain though, his trial didn't even come close to the notion of a fair and impartial assessment of all the pertinent facts of the case.

On the eve of the trial a Dallas newspaper published what was supposedly a "confession" made by McVeigh to his attorneys. The mainstream media ballyhooed this for several days, virtually guaranteeing a prejudice jury right from the start. Here are the key points which shows how most of the important evidence and eyewitness testimony was suppressed.

* The prosecution didn't call at least a dozen witnesses who could of placed McVeigh at the scene, because all the witnesses saw him with one or more other people. (46)

* Jim Sargeant and Georgia Rucker weren't called as witnesses. They said they saw a Ryder truck at Geary State Park during the week of April 10. The freelance reporter, Ryan Ross tells us why; "McVeigh was checked into a motel in Kingman, Arizona at the time. Prosecutors won't want to raise the possibility that someone other than McVeigh built the bomb."

*Judge Richard Matsch wouldn't allow the defences lead attorney, Stephen Jones, to call it's own bomb experts such as General Partin.

* Judge Matsch wouldn't allow the testimony of Caroll Howe, ruling it "could confuse or mislead the jury." Howes testimony would have shown that others had motive and opportunity to bomb the Murrah building. She may also have testified to the fact that she had warned the government on several occasions that the Murrah building was a target for bombing, proving the government had prior knowledge.

* Judge Matsch wouldn't allow Jones to present any kind of conspiracy defence, either of Middle Eastern or government origin, regardless of how much evidence there was to support these theories.

* After making these unprecedented and highly unorthodox rulings, which were extremely pertinent to the case, Judge Matsch proceeded to allow the prosecution to wallow in a sea of irrelevant and emotional claptrap, which constituted over half of the prosecutions case.

* The Judges rulings in the case have been severely criticized by Gerry Spence, one of the best criminal lawyers in the country, and by Harvard law professor Alan Dershowitz. They have also been highly critical of Jones' abysmal defence. One defence lawyer said he's seen lengthier defences for drunken driving. (47)

Another prominent defence lawyer, Nancy Lord said that Jones "should have violated the judge's order" preventing him from introducing Howe or some others with purported knowledge of a wider plot. "This is a case where Stephen Jones should have violated the Judge's order, presented evidence of a larger conspiracy to the jury, and gone to jail for contempt. If I would have been the defence attorney, some things are important enough to go to jail for," Lord said. "I am shocked at Stephen Jones' conduct in this case." (48)

* Jones was paid, or paid off, somewhere in the region of ten million dollars by the government to "defend" McVeigh. A strong incentive not to rock the boat.

As usual the mainstream media, the fawning handmaidens of the government, were falling all over themselves to gorge at the governments trough of lies, which are then re-assembled into trial "facts". They are then set loose to doctor up the "facts" even more, in a frantic effort to establish the government line as "revealed truth." They pitifully wallow in blatant, misplaced emotionalism, wringing every last ounce of exploitative propaganda they can from the Oklahoma tragedy. They patronizingly tell us that McVeigh's guilt provides all of us with "closure" (whatever that piece of pseudo psychology is meant to mean). Of course the victims, survivors and their families suffered terribly, but the rest of us don't need this sort of junk psychology to salve our non-existing wounds.

WHAT WOULD BE THE GOVERNMENTS MOTIVE??
CLICK FULL REPORT:
http://www.wealth4freedom.com/ReflectionOK.html

============

This version of Gavin Phillips story on Oklahoma City may be of ...
... and later arrest him as the prime suspect in the Oklahoma City bombing. (3)
... When JD Cash, a journalist writing for the McCurtain County Gazette,, ...
HTTP://www.wealth4freedom.com/ReflectionOK.html

=================

Oklahoma Bombing Investigation Committee Home Page
... Charles Key Oklahoma Bombing Investigation Committee PO Box 75667 Oklahoma
City, OK 73147 Phone: 405-470-1231. Or fill out our email form to contact us. ...

Results 1 - 10 of about 24,700 for CHARLES KEY "Oklahoma City Bombing"