911 and the Precautionary Principle: Aircraft Parts as a Clue to their
Identity
by George Nelson
Colonel, USAF (ret.)
http://www.physics911.net/georgenelson.htm
The precautionary principle is based on the fact that the failure to prove a
proposition completely does not disprove the proposition. If the proposition
warns of an ongoing or oncoming disaster (e.g. global warming) it is wise to
take precautions. The proposition arrived at here is this: the 911
hijackings and damage to buildings were not the work of Arab terrorists, but
appear to have been part of a black operation carried out with the
cooperation of elements in our government.
In July 1965 I had just been commissioned as a Second Lieutenant in the U.
S. Air Force after taking a solemn oath that I would protect and defend the
Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic, and that I would
bear true faith and allegiance to the same. I took that oath very seriously.
It was my constant companion throughout a thirty-year military career in the
field of aircraft maintenance.
As an additional duty, aircraft maintenance officers are occasionally tasked
as members of aircraft accident investigation boards and my personal
experience was no exception. In 1989 I graduated from the Aircraft Mishap
Investigation Course at the Institute of Safety and Systems Management at
the University of Southern California. In addition to my direct
participation as an aircraft accident investigator, I reviewed countless
aircraft accident investigation reports for thoroughness and comprehensive
conclusions for the Inspector General, HQ Pacific Air Forces during the
height of the Vietnam conflict.
In all my years of direct and indirect participation, I never witnessed nor
even heard of an aircraft loss, where the wreckage was accessible, that
prevented investigators from finding enough hard evidence to positively
identify the make, model, and specific registration number of the aircraft
-- and in most cases the precise cause of the accident. This is because
every military and civilian passenger-carrying aircraft have many parts that
are identified for safety of flight. That is, if any of the parts were to
fail at any time during a flight, the failure would likely result in the
catastrophic loss of aircraft and passengers. Consequently, these parts are
individually controlled by a distinctive serial number and tracked by a
records section of the maintenance operation and by another section called
plans and scheduling.
Following a certain number of flying hours or, in the case of landing gears,
a certain number of takeoff-and-landing cycles, these critical parts are
required to be changed, overhauled or inspected by specialist mechanics.
When these parts are installed, their serial numbers are married to the
aircraft registration numbers in the aircraft records and the plans and
scheduling section will notify maintenance specialists when the parts must
be replaced. If the parts are not replaced within specified time or cycle
limits, the airplane will normally be grounded until the maintenance action
is completed. Most of these time-change parts, whether hydraulic flight
surface actuators , pumps, landing gears, engines or engine components, are
virtually indestructible. It would be impossible for an ordinary fire
resulting from an airplane crash to destroy or obliterate all of those
critical time-change parts or their serial numbers. I repeat, impossible.
Considering the catastrophic incidents of September 11 2001, certain
troubling but irrefutable conclusions must be drawn from the known facts. I
get no personal pleasure or satisfaction from reporting my own assessment of
these facts.
United Airlines Flight 93
This flight was reported by the federal government to be a Boeing 757
aircraft, registration number N591UA, carrying 45 persons, including four
Arab hijackers who had taken control of the aircraft, crashing the plane in
a Pennsylvania farm field.
Aerial photos of the alleged crash site were made available to the general
public. They show a significant hole in the ground, but private
investigators were not allowed to come anywhere near the crash site. If an
aircraft crash caused the hole in the ground, there would have literally
hundreds of serially-controlled time-change parts within the hole that would
have proved beyond any shadow of doubt the precise tail-number or identity
of the aircraft. However, the the government has not produced any hard
evidence that would prove beyond a doubt that the specifically alleged
aircraft crashed at that site. On the contrary, it has been reported that
the aircraft, registry number N591UA, is still in operation.
American Airlines Flight 11
This flight was reported by the government to be a Boeing 767, registration
number N334AA, carrying 92 people, including five Arabs who had hijacked the
plane. This plane was reported to have crashed into the north tower of the
WTC complex of buildings.
Again, the government would have no trouble proving its case if only a few
of the hundreds of serially controlled parts had been collected to
positively identify the aircraft. A Boeing 767 landing gear or just one
engine would have been easy to find and identify.
United Airlines Flight 175
This flight was reported to be a Boeing 767, registration number N612UA,
carrying 65 people, including the crew and five hijackers. It reportedly
flew into the south tower of the WTC.
Once more, the government has yet to produce one serially controlled part
from the crash site that would have dispelled any questions as to the
identity of the specific airplane.
American Airlines Flight 77
This was reported to be a Boeing 757, registration number N644AA, carrying
64 people, including the flight crew and five hijackers. This aircraft, with
a 125-foot wingspan, was reported to have crashed into the Pentagon, leaving
an entry hole no more than 65 feet wide.
Following cool-down of the resulting fire, this crash site would have been
very easy to collect enough time-change equipment within 15 minutes to
positively identify the aircraft registry. There was apparently some
aerospace type of equipment found at the site but no attempt was made to
produce aerial numbers or to identify the specific parts found. Some of the
equipment removed from the building was actually hidden from public view.
Conclusion
The government alleges that four wide-body airliners crashed on the morning
of September 11 2001, resulting in the deaths of more than 3,000 human
beings, yet not one piece of hard aircraft evidence has been produced in an
attempt to positively identify any of the four aircraft. On the contrary, it
seems only that all potential evidence was deliberately kept hidden from
public view. The hard evidence would have included hundreds of critical
time-change aircraft items, plus security videotapes that were confiscated
by the FBI immediately following each tragic episode.
With all the evidence readily available at the Pentagon crash site, any
unbiased rational investigator could only conclude that a Boeing 757 did not
fly into the Pentagon as alleged. Similarly, with all the evidence available
at the Pennsylvania crash site, it was most doubtful that a passenger
airliner caused the obvious hole in the ground and certainly not the Boeing
757 as alleged. Regarding the planes that allegedly flew into the WTC
towers, it is only just possible that heavy aircraft were involved in each
incident, but no evidence has been produced that would add credence to the
government's theoretical version of what actually caused the total
destruction of the buildings, let alone proving the identity of the
aircraft. That is the problem with the governmentıs 911 story. It is time to
apply the precautionary principle.
As painful and heartbreaking as was the loss of innocent lives and the
lingering health problems of thousands more, a most troublesome and
nightmarish probability remains that so many Americans appear to be involved
in the most heinous conspiracy in our country's history.
=====================================
9-11 Attack on America
.....STRANGER THAN FICTION
MUCH MORE:>>