9/11 - Incredible NEWS footage hidden from TVTue Apr 3, 2007 02:59
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Incredible NEWS footage that was hidden from TV, see it before it taken off
Date: 03 Apr 2007 00:46:45 -0700, Tue, 3 Apr 2007 00:46:13 -0800
From: Raven NWRaven@gmail.com
An astounding video uncovered from the archives today shows the BBC reporting on the collapse of WTC Building 7 over twenty minutes before it fell at 5:20pm on the afternoon of 9/11. The shows a BBC reporter talking about the collapse of the Salomon Brothers Building while it remains standing in the live shot behind her head.
Clip from the Alex Jones and infowars... Clip from the Alex Jones and infowars.com movie "Martial Law 9/11: Rise of the Police State". The answer to 9/11 is in building seven. Watch the owner of the WTC say on PBS that they "pulled" the building... and watch a clip from the same PBS special that shows them say "pull it" again to describe control demolition.
"We're getting ready to pull building six."
"We want to be very careful how we demolish building six. This is the undenyable fact. This is what many family members of the victims are asking about. It's time for a real trial and conviction for those who are responsible. Beware men who deny the law of God to lie, steal, and murder for power. (more)
"No fraud is more odios than an attempt to subvert the administration of justice."
From page 55 of 116, We the People v. United States, et al., including State of Washington, AG Rob McKenna and the bar associations in general as defendants. Complaint deals with Substantive Due Process, Racketeering, Fraud Upon The Court, and Violation of the Separation of Powers. Filed under Case 4:06-cv-00460-TCK-PJC, Filed in USDC ND/OK on 09/06/2006. Cite referenced above from Hazel-Atlas Glass Co. v. Hartford-Empire Co., 322 U.S. 238 (1944). See: 322 U.S. 772, 64 S.Ct. 1281. Argued Feb. 9, 10, 1944. Decided May 15, 1944; Rehearing Denied June 12, 1944. Mr. Justice BLACK delivered the opinion of the Court. The case involves the power of a Circuit Court of Appeals, upon proof that fraud was perpetrated on it by a successful litigant, to vacate its own judgment entered at a prior time and direct vacation of a District Court's decree entered pursuant to the Circuit Court of Appeals' mandate.
On page five of the Complaint: This petition does not delve into the wisdom, need, or disirability of legislative enactments occurring in Oklahoma State Statute Five, Chapter One, App. One, Articles One and Two. This petition illustrates that Oklahoma State State Statute Five, Chapter One, App. One, Articles One and Two strike at the very fiber of constitutional prohibitions known as the separation of powers. Congress, in enacting civil racketeering laws intended that a person such as We the People are private attorney generals. See: Agency Holding Corp. v. Malley-Duff & Associates, 107 Supreme Court, 2759, 583 U.S. 143, 151 (1987) and Rotella v. Wood et al, 528 U.S. 548 (2000). This complaint is a compelling testimony for want of a competent United States Attorney General. Also note the Dick Act of 1902. The Dick Act of 1902 also known as the Efficiency of Militia Bill, H.R. 11654, of June 28, 1902, invalidates ALL so-called gun-control laws. It also divides the militia into three distinct and separate entities. The three classes H.R. 11654 provides for are the organized militia, henceforth known as the National Guard of the States, Territory and District of Columbia, the unorganized militia and the regular army. The militia encompasses every able-bodied male between the ages of 18 and 45. All members of the unorganized militia have the absolute personal right and 2nd Amendment right to keep and bear arms of any type, and as many as they can afford to buy. The Dick Act of 1902 cannot be repealed; to do so would violate bills of attainder and ex post facto laws which would be yet another gross violation of the U.S. Constitution and the Bill of Rights. The President of the United States has ZERO AUTHORITY without violating the Constitution to call the National Guard to serve outside of their State borders.
Read the complete Complaint here: We the People v US.pdf (Let it load... its fairly large, 3.5mb!)
The Theory of the Case and the Issues to be resolved begin on Page 69.
"It is not the function of our Government to keep the citizen from falling into error; it is the function of the citizen to keep the Government from falling into error." --U.S. Supreme Court Justice Robert Jackson, in American Communications Association v. Douds, 339 U.S. 382, 442 (1950).
Robert and Christine Birdwell, and
Stephen L. Wozny, Attorney at law
813 NE 133rd Street
Vancouver, WA 98685
Main Page -
Message Board by American Patriot Friends Network [APFN]
APFN MESSAGEBOARD ARCHIVES