WTC Jet Engine Confirmed NOT From Boeing 767

WTC Jet Engine Confirmed NOT From Boeing 767
By Jon Carlson
carlson.jon@att.net
4-4-5

Popular Mechanics, while mentioning that an engine from the South Tower airliner landed in the street, neglected to show an engine photo, engine street location, and engine positive identification. Just by identifying undamaged parts from the damaged engine positive identification of the engine was made in the article: However, the engine identified, a CFM56, is the primary engine of the Boeing 737 not the Boeing 767 alleged to have struck the South Tower.

Shortly after the article was posted, a Boeing 767 airliner mechanic emailed that he concurred with the engine identification and that it was not from a Boeing 767.

Excerpts from his email:

I am an A&P mechanic for a major airline. I overhaul 767's. The engines are NOT from a 767. No 767 in existence uses CFM56's. Not enough power to lift a '67.

THOSE ENGINES ON THE STREET IN NEW YORK DID NOT COME OFF A 767.

Engine location. Church & Murray Street.
CLICK FOR IMG AND REST OF STORY:
http://www.rense.com/general63/wtcc.htm

"If we don't believe in freedom of expression for
people we despise, we don't believe in it at all."
-Noam Chomsky
http://www.rense.com/