Liberty Forums
USA, Inc. - Overview .....
Wed Mar 9, 2005 14:58
64.140.158.63
Subject: USA, Inc. - Overview .....
Liberty Forums
Liberty Forums ( http://www.liberty.com/forum/index.php )
Government ( http://www.liberty.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=4 )
USA, Inc. - Overview ( http://www.liberty.com/forum/showthread.php?t=83 )
===========
Bill Shoots 02-12-2005 05:00 PM
----------
USA, Inc. - Overview
The only comments of mine in the below are in [ ]s. Bill Shoots
* * * * * * * * * * * * *
Previous posting date: 27 November 2004
Urban Survival: Free Daily Economic News Update Page
http://www.urbansurvival.com/week.htm#corps
Corporate Takeover of Government Well Underway
Here's one of the best reader submissions ever: - scary, true, and
excellent research:
"Still think you're free? Still think all you have to do is vote the
incumbent out of office and everything will automatically return to
'normal.' It's too late. Protesting, voting, or - laughably - letters to
the editor won't change anything.
Look at the corporate info I found at the Delaware Secretary of State
website:
INTERNAL REVENUE TAX AND AUDIT SERVICE (IRS) "For Profit" General Delaware
Corporation Incorporation date 7/12/33 File No. 0325720
FEDERAL RESERVE ASSOCIATION (Federal Reserve) Non-profit Delaware
Corporation Incorporation date 9/13/14 File No. 0042817
CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AUTHORITY INC. (CIA) "For Profit" General Delaware
Corporation Incorporation Date 3/9/83 File No. 2004409 Background info:
Transfers: With the National Security Council to the Executive Office of
the President by Reorganization Plan No. 4 of 1949, effective August 20,
1949; to independent agency status by EO 12333, December 4, 1981.
[Bill Shoots: SSU following is Strategic Services Unit]
CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE GROUP Established under the National Intelligence
Authority by Presidential directive, January 22, 1946, to plan and
coordinate foreign intelligence activities. By National Intelligence
Authority Directive 4, April 2, 1946, NIA assumed supervision of the SSU
dissolution during spring and summer 1946, assigning some components to
Central Intelligence Group at request of Director of Central Intelligence,
and effecting incorporation of the remaining units into other War
Department organizations. SSU officially abolished by General Order 16,
SSU, October 19, 1946. Central Intelligence Group and National Intelligence
Authority abolished by National Security Act, which created the CIA, 1947.
SEE 263.1.
FEDERAL LAND ACQUISITION CORP. "For-profit" General Delaware Corporation
Incorporation Date 8/22/80 File No. 0897960
RTC COMMERCIAL ASSETS TRUST 1995-NP3-2 "For-profit" Delaware Statutory Trust
Incorporation Date 10/24/95 File No. 2554768
SOCIAL SECURITY CORP, DEPART. OF HEALTH, EDUCATION AND WELF "For-Profit"
General Delaware Corporation Incorporation date: 11/13/89 File No. 2213135
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, INC. Non-profit Delaware Corporation Incorporation
Date 4/19/89 File No. 2193946
http://www.state.de.us/corp/directweb.shtml (Please look at #1 at the end
of the paragraph it states "click here for status on the web." From there,
at the end of the first paragraph "receive a status inquiry on line, CLICK
HERE." That takes you to 'General Information Name Search.')
Keep in mind - these are just the listings I could find. For example, I
tracked down the Bureau of Engraving and Printing - in the state of Texas
(foreign corp from the District of Columbia).
[Bill Shoots: Perhaps that's why the first issuance of the new $20 bills
was in Dallas.]
This means, as 'citizens,' we are assets of the corporation. It doesn't
matter who is in office, the board of directors and the shareholders own
and run the country - just as in any other corporation.
Roosevelt's quote has an entirely different meaning now:
"The real truth of the matter is, as you and I know, that a financial
element in the large centers has owned the government of the U.S. since the
days of Andrew Jackson." -- Franklin D. Roosevelt in a letter written Nov.
21, 1933 to Colonel E. Mandell House
The thing to find out, and I'm hoping the corporate records will show, is
who are the shareholders? Who profits - for example - from the 'private,
for-profit, corporate CIA' or the 'private, for-profit, corporate IRS' or
the 'private, for-profit Social Security' - that those in charge are now
telling us is 'broke.' Who is on the board of directors of 'UNITED STATES
OF AMERICA, INC.'
Ask anyone you know if they are aware of this. Call your congressman's
office and ask them. Why doesn't anyone know? Why isn't this casually
mentioned in the news? 'The Board of Directors of the United States of
America, Inc., today ruled........' 'The Board of Directors of the Social
Security........' 'Today, the Central Intelligence Authority filed as a
private for-profit corporation.' Why do those in charge never mention this?
Why, searching on any search engine, doesn't this information come up?
Because we're being lied to. Ever wonder why those who fight the IRS are
not allowed to bring up their Constitutional Rights in tax court?
Constitutional Rights do not apply in an equity court. Contract law
supersedes individual and Constitutional Rights. Corporate law is a totally
different animal from common law. Ask any corporate attorney. You've
inadvertently signed contracts with this bastard entity posing as the
'free' United States of America - wh you registered to vote, when you
applied for a checking account (at a Federal Reserve corp bank - look at
your signature card, it states you will comply with all rulings from the
Secretary of the Treasury), when you applied for a social security card.....
Ever look at the trust corporations (such as the RESOLUTION TRUST CORP
(RTC) associated with the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, INC.? Trust - a
fiduciary relationship in which one party holds legal title to another's
property for the benefit of a party who holds equitable title to the
property. Who holds the equitable title? Ever notice property deeds state
'tenant' when referring to the supposed owner?
Ever notice property deeds state 'tenant' when referring to the supposed
owner? Yup! you think you own it, you're just a tenant and paying rent in
the nature of a "property tax".
We are ruled by fictitious entities - corporations are fictions. We have
been lied to, our entire lives, that we are free. The United States is
owned, lock, stock, and barrel, each of us as citizens of the United States
is owned. The question to which I want the answer is: Who owns us?
"The few who understand the system, will either be so interested in its
profits, or so dependent on its favors that there will be no opposition
from that class, while on the other hand, the great body of people,
mentally incapable of comprehending the tremendous advantages...will bear
its burden without complaint, and perhaps without suspecting that the
system is inimical to their best interests." Rothschild Brothers of London
communique to associates in New York June 25, 1863.
* * * * * * * * * * * * *
Bill Shoots 02-12-2005 05:08 PM
----------
USA, Inc. - Abstract - 1 of 3
The only comments of mine in the below are in [ ]s. Bill Shoots
* * * * * * * * * * * * *
Previous posting date: 21 November 2004
Corporate USA - Forums powered by Reason and Principle
http://wwwlibertyforum.org/showfla...0#Post293121050
Corporate USA [ Post 293121050 ]
Category: News & Opinion (General) Topic: Government
Synopsis: 1913 Marked the end of our Republic and we were never told
Source: Team Law
Published: January 1, 1996 Author: Team Law
For Education and Discussion Only. Not for Commercial Use.
Corp. USA
Under The District of Columbia Organic Act of 1871 a private corporation
named, "The District of Columbia", was formed. It trademarked the names
"THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT", "United States", "U.S.", "U.S.A.", "USA",
and "America". It should be noted that this corporation was not simply a
reformation of the municipality as it's Organic Act was chartered in 1808.
Without amending that municipality's charter, this 1871 Act marked the
creation of a new private corporation known as, "The District of Columbia"
(hereinafter "Corp. U.S.") owned and operated by the actual government for
the purpose of carrying out the business needs of the government under
martial law. This was done under the constitutional authority for Congress
to pass any law within the ten mile square of Washington, District of
Columbia. In said, Act Corp. U.S. adopted their own constitution the
(United States Constitution), which was identical to the national
Constitution (Constitution of the United States of America) except that it
was missing the national Constitution's 13th Article of Amendment and the
national Constitution's 13th, 14th and 15th Articles of Amendment are
respectively numbered 14th, 15th and 16th Amendments in their constitution.
Corp. U.S. was not well received by the people so Congress revised the Act
in 1874 and finalized it in 1878.
Corp. U.S. began issuing bonds to cover the expenses of running government.
By 1912 there was more bond debt due than there was money in the Treasury
to pay and the debt was called.
Seven very powerful families had been buying up the bonds and in 1912 they
demanded their timely redemption. When Corp. U.S. couldn't come up with the
money due, its owner (the actual government) was obligated to pay. The
Treasury of the United States of America did not have sufficient funds to
cover the bonds either but the seven families accepted all of the assets of
the nation's Treasury along with all of the assets of Corp. U.S'. Treasury
as a settlement of the debt saving the nation from bankruptcy.
By 1913 there was still no money for operating the government/corporation,
and if Corp. U.S. didn't do something the people would revolt against them,
so Corp. U.S. went to those seven very powerful families and asked if they
could borrow money from them.
The Federal Reserve Bank
The heads of those families refused to loan Corp. U.S. any money because
Corp. U.S. had already proven that it would not pay its debts back in full.
They did however make arrangements and provisions to issue notes (Federal
Reserve Notes) like letters of credit while they secured the notes for
redemption with real money. On Jekyll Island in 1913 the Federal Reserve
Bank privately agreed to so fund Corp. U.S. in their endeavors. Such an
action would have been a gigantic violation of law if the government tried
such a thing, but there is no law against private corporations making such
arrangements.
The real problem is in the name. How does one tell the difference between a
corporation going by the name, "THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT", and the
government of the Unites States of America?
What's worse, how do you tell the difference between the "United States" [a
Trust and the body of government that represents the Trust, as Trustees],
and the "United States" a trademark name for, "The District of Columbia" [a
private corporation]?
The answer is simple, you can't unless you can tell by the context of
what's being done.
The problem gets even larger when you take into consideration the fact that
the officers of government are also the officers of the corporation. They
were simultaneously appointed or elected into their offices, both in the
corporation and in the government at the same time. In virtually every way
the name of their offices and their responsibilities as corporate officials
and as government officers were coincidental between 1871 and 1913.
There was no conflict in interest because the Corp. U.S'. purpose was to
fulfill the business needs of the actual government.
I'm not going to here go into all of the details and ramifications of the
arrangements between Corp. U.S. and the Federal Reserve Bank. The simple
fact is: Where the government couldn't lawfully be involved with the
Federal Reserve Bank, the corporation can be.
Vacating the seats of Government
Under all of the media coverage of the Federal Reserve Bank Act, Corp. U.S.
passes and adopts (as if ratified) their own 16th Amendment. Remember, this
amendment has nothing to do with our nation, with our people or with our
national Constitution, which already had its own 16th Article of Amendment
as of 1870. The Supreme Court ruled that Corp. U.S'. 16th Amendment did
nothing that was not already done other than to make plain and clear the
right of the United States (Corp. U.S.) to tax corporations. We agree,
considering that they were obviously created only under the authority of
Corp. U.S. Two months later Corp. U.S'. Congress entered their 17th
Amendment as ratified. Again in the corporate ratification pattern of the
Corp. U.S. 16th amendment was followed with actual State ratification. This
amendment is not even constitutional; the Constitution forbids Congress
from even discussing the matter of where Senators are elected. For our
national Congress to pass such an Amendment they would first have to Amend
the Constitution to allow their discussion of the matter. Either way the
result is that in Corp. U.S. their corporate officials known as Senators
would thereafter be elected by a popular vote of their contracted voting
public, while in the actual government (hereinafter "original jurisdiction
government") Senators would continue to be appointed by the State's
Legislature or by the State's Governor. In other words, the Corp. U.S.
seats and the original jurisdiction government seats would not thereafter
be seated by the same individual.
In 1914, the Freshman class and all Senators that successfully ran for
reelection in 1913 by popular vote are seated in Corp. U.S. capacity only
and the original jurisdiction Senate seat was vacated, because the States
failed to appoint new Senators (after all no law compels them to).
In 1917, Corp. U.S. enters W.W.I and passes their Trading with the Enemies
Act.
In 1918, President Wilson is reelected by the Electoral College but their
election is required to be confirmed by the constitutionally set Senate;
where the new Corp. U.S. only Senators were allowed to participate in the
Electoral College vote confirmation the only authority that could possibly
have been used for electoral confirmation was corporate only. Therefore,
President Wilson was not confirmed into office for his second term as
President of the United States of America and was only seated in the Corp.
U.S. Presidential capacity. Therefore the original jurisdiction
government's seats were vacated because the people didn't seat any original
jurisdiction government officers.
In 1933, Corp. U.S. went bankrupt and the States agreed to support their
resolution. In keeping with the bankruptcy, the Corp. U.S. Congress
adjusted their Trading with the Enemies Act with their Emergency War Powers
Act, which recognized the people of the United States of America are
enemies of Corp. U.S.
No Elections since 1913
Therefore there was no election of officers of the government of the United
States of America. And all of America was none the wiser. The government
was still there and the Constitution was still alive and well and living in
Washington, D.C. but once again** there was nobody sitting in the seats of
the officers of government; just like it was when the founding fathers
signed the Constitution but the States had not ratified it, the government
existed but no one was seated in office.
There hasn't been an Election since, and there won't be one until America
once again wakes up.
This is fantastic, I know, but look at the facts! This is the only solution
that makes sense and fits the facts.
[Continued]
Bill Shoots 02-12-2005 05:13 PM
----------
USA, Inc. - Abstract - 2 of 3
[Continuing]
=======================================
Bill Shoots 02-12-2005 05:13 PM
----------
USA, Inc. - Abstract - 2 of 3
[Continuing]
The U.N., IMF, & World Bank
So we jump from 1913 and the setting of the Federal Reserv
Liberty Forums
Liberty Forums ( http://www.liberty.com/forum/index.php )
Government ( http://www.liberty.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=4 )
USA, Inc. - Overview ( http://www.liberty.com/forum/showthread.php?t=83 )
===========
Bill Shoots 02-12-2005 05:00 PM
----------
USA, Inc. - Overview
The only comments of mine in the below are in [ ]s. Bill Shoots
* * * * * * * * * * * * *
Previous posting date: 27 November 2004
Urban Survival: Free Daily Economic News Update Page
http://www.urbansurvival.com/week.htm#corps
Corporate Takeover of Government Well Underway
Here's one of the best reader submissions ever: - scary, true, and
excellent research:
"Still think you're free? Still think all you have to do is vote the
incumbent out of office and everything will automatically return to
'normal.' It's too late. Protesting, voting, or - laughably - letters to
the editor won't change anything.
Look at the corporate info I found at the Delaware Secretary of State
website:
INTERNAL REVENUE TAX AND AUDIT SERVICE (IRS) "For Profit" General Delaware
Corporation Incorporation date 7/12/33 File No. 0325720
FEDERAL RESERVE ASSOCIATION (Federal Reserve) Non-profit Delaware
Corporation Incorporation date 9/13/14 File No. 0042817
CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AUTHORITY INC. (CIA) "For Profit" General Delaware
Corporation Incorporation Date 3/9/83 File No. 2004409 Background info:
Transfers: With the National Security Council to the Executive Office of
the President by Reorganization Plan No. 4 of 1949, effective August 20,
1949; to independent agency status by EO 12333, December 4, 1981.
[Bill Shoots: SSU following is Strategic Services Unit]
CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE GROUP Established under the National Intelligence
Authority by Presidential directive, January 22, 1946, to plan and
coordinate foreign intelligence activities. By National Intelligence
Authority Directive 4, April 2, 1946, NIA assumed supervision of the SSU
dissolution during spring and summer 1946, assigning some components to
Central Intelligence Group at request of Director of Central Intelligence,
and effecting incorporation of the remaining units into other War
Department organizations. SSU officially abolished by General Order 16,
SSU, October 19, 1946. Central Intelligence Group and National Intelligence
Authority abolished by National Security Act, which created the CIA, 1947.
SEE 263.1.
FEDERAL LAND ACQUISITION CORP. "For-profit" General Delaware Corporation
Incorporation Date 8/22/80 File No. 0897960
RTC COMMERCIAL ASSETS TRUST 1995-NP3-2 "For-profit" Delaware Statutory Trust
Incorporation Date 10/24/95 File No. 2554768
SOCIAL SECURITY CORP, DEPART. OF HEALTH, EDUCATION AND WELF "For-Profit"
General Delaware Corporation Incorporation date: 11/13/89 File No. 2213135
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, INC. Non-profit Delaware Corporation Incorporation
Date 4/19/89 File No. 2193946
http://www.state.de.us/corp/directweb.shtml (Please look at #1 at the end
of the paragraph it states "click here for status on the web." From there,
at the end of the first paragraph "receive a status inquiry on line, CLICK
HERE." That takes you to 'General Information Name Search.')
Keep in mind - these are just the listings I could find. For example, I
tracked down the Bureau of Engraving and Printing - in the state of Texas
(foreign corp from the District of Columbia).
[Bill Shoots: Perhaps that's why the first issuance of the new $20 bills
was in Dallas.]
This means, as 'citizens,' we are assets of the corporation. It doesn't
matter who is in office, the board of directors and the shareholders own
and run the country - just as in any other corporation.
Roosevelt's quote has an entirely different meaning now:
"The real truth of the matter is, as you and I know, that a financial
element in the large centers has owned the government of the U.S. since the
days of Andrew Jackson." -- Franklin D. Roosevelt in a letter written Nov.
21, 1933 to Colonel E. Mandell House
The thing to find out, and I'm hoping the corporate records will show, is
who are the shareholders? Who profits - for example - from the 'private,
for-profit, corporate CIA' or the 'private, for-profit, corporate IRS' or
the 'private, for-profit Social Security' - that those in charge are now
telling us is 'broke.' Who is on the board of directors of 'UNITED STATES
OF AMERICA, INC.'
Ask anyone you know if they are aware of this. Call your congressman's
office and ask them. Why doesn't anyone know? Why isn't this casually
mentioned in the news? 'The Board of Directors of the United States of
America, Inc., today ruled........' 'The Board of Directors of the Social
Security........' 'Today, the Central Intelligence Authority filed as a
private for-profit corporation.' Why do those in charge never mention this?
Why, searching on any search engine, doesn't this information come up?
Because we're being lied to. Ever wonder why those who fight the IRS are
not allowed to bring up their Constitutional Rights in tax court?
Constitutional Rights do not apply in an equity court. Contract law
supersedes individual and Constitutional Rights. Corporate law is a totally
different animal from common law. Ask any corporate attorney. You've
inadvertently signed contracts with this bastard entity posing as the
'free' United States of America - wh you registered to vote, when you
applied for a checking account (at a Federal Reserve corp bank - look at
your signature card, it states you will comply with all rulings from the
Secretary of the Treasury), when you applied for a social security card.....
Ever look at the trust corporations (such as the RESOLUTION TRUST CORP
(RTC) associated with the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, INC.? Trust - a
fiduciary relationship in which one party holds legal title to another's
property for the benefit of a party who holds equitable title to the
property. Who holds the equitable title? Ever notice property deeds state
'tenant' when referring to the supposed owner?
Ever notice property deeds state 'tenant' when referring to the supposed
owner? Yup! you think you own it, you're just a tenant and paying rent in
the nature of a "property tax".
We are ruled by fictitious entities - corporations are fictions. We have
been lied to, our entire lives, that we are free. The United States is
owned, lock, stock, and barrel, each of us as citizens of the United States
is owned. The question to which I want the answer is: Who owns us?
"The few who understand the system, will either be so interested in its
profits, or so dependent on its favors that there will be no opposition
from that class, while on the other hand, the great body of people,
mentally incapable of comprehending the tremendous advantages...will bear
its burden without complaint, and perhaps without suspecting that the
system is inimical to their best interests." Rothschild Brothers of London
communique to associates in New York June 25, 1863.
* * * * * * * * * * * * *
Bill Shoots 02-12-2005 05:08 PM
----------
USA, Inc. - Abstract - 1 of 3
The only comments of mine in the below are in [ ]s. Bill Shoots
* * * * * * * * * * * * *
Previous posting date: 21 November 2004
Corporate USA - Forums powered by Reason and Principle
http://wwwlibertyforum.org/showfla...0#Post293121050
Corporate USA [ Post 293121050 ]
Category: News & Opinion (General) Topic: Government
Synopsis: 1913 Marked the end of our Republic and we were never told
Source: Team Law
Published: January 1, 1996 Author: Team Law
For Education and Discussion Only. Not for Commercial Use.
Corp. USA
Under The District of Columbia Organic Act of 1871 a private corporation
named, "The District of Columbia", was formed. It trademarked the names
"THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT", "United States", "U.S.", "U.S.A.", "USA",
and "America". It should be noted that this corporation was not simply a
reformation of the municipality as it's Organic Act was chartered in 1808.
Without amending that municipality's charter, this 1871 Act marked the
creation of a new private corporation known as, "The District of Columbia"
(hereinafter "Corp. U.S.") owned and operated by the actual government for
the purpose of carrying out the business needs of the government under
martial law. This was done under the constitutional authority for Congress
to pass any law within the ten mile square of Washington, District of
Columbia. In said, Act Corp. U.S. adopted their own constitution the
(United States Constitution), which was identical to the national
Constitution (Constitution of the United States of America) except that it
was missing the national Constitution's 13th Article of Amendment and the
national Constitution's 13th, 14th and 15th Articles of Amendment are
respectively numbered 14th, 15th and 16th Amendments in their constitution.
Corp. U.S. was not well received by the people so Congress revised the Act
in 1874 and finalized it in 1878.
Corp. U.S. began issuing bonds to cover the expenses of running government.
By 1912 there was more bond debt due than there was money in the Treasury
to pay and the debt was called.
Seven very powerful families had been buying up the bonds and in 1912 they
demanded their timely redemption. When Corp. U.S. couldn't come up with the
money due, its owner (the actual government) was obligated to pay. The
Treasury of the United States of America did not have sufficient funds to
cover the bonds either but the seven families accepted all of the assets of
the nation's Treasury along with all of the assets of Corp. U.S'. Treasury
as a settlement of the debt saving the nation from bankruptcy.
By 1913 there was still no money for operating the government/corporation,
and if Corp. U.S. didn't do something the people would revolt against them,
so Corp. U.S. went to those seven very powerful families and asked if they
could borrow money from them.
The Federal Reserve Bank
The heads of those families refused to loan Corp. U.S. any money because
Corp. U.S. had already proven that it would not pay its debts back in full.
They did however make arrangements and provisions to issue notes (Federal
Reserve Notes) like letters of credit while they secured the notes for
redemption with real money. On Jekyll Island in 1913 the Federal Reserve
Bank privately agreed to so fund Corp. U.S. in their endeavors. Such an
action would have been a gigantic violation of law if the government tried
such a thing, but there is no law against private corporations making such
arrangements.
The real problem is in the name. How does one tell the difference between a
corporation going by the name, "THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT", and the
government of the Unites States of America?
What's worse, how do you tell the difference between the "United States" [a
Trust and the body of government that represents the Trust, as Trustees],
and the "United States" a trademark name for, "The District of Columbia" [a
private corporation]?
The answer is simple, you can't unless you can tell by the context of
what's being done.
The problem gets even larger when you take into consideration the fact that
the officers of government are also the officers of the corporation. They
were simultaneously appointed or elected into their offices, both in the
corporation and in the government at the same time. In virtually every way
the name of their offices and their responsibilities as corporate officials
and as government officers were coincidental between 1871 and 1913.
There was no conflict in interest because the Corp. U.S'. purpose was to
fulfill the business needs of the actual government.
I'm not going to here go into all of the details and ramifications of the
arrangements between Corp. U.S. and the Federal Reserve Bank. The simple
fact is: Where the government couldn't lawfully be involved with the
Federal Reserve Bank, the corporation can be.
Vacating the seats of Government
Under all of the media coverage of the Federal Reserve Bank Act, Corp. U.S.
passes and adopts (as if ratified) their own 16th Amendment. Remember, this
amendment has nothing to do with our nation, with our people or with our
national Constitution, which already had its own 16th Article of Amendment
as of 1870. The Supreme Court ruled that Corp. U.S'. 16th Amendment did
nothing that was not already done other than to make plain and clear the
right of the United States (Corp. U.S.) to tax corporations. We agree,
considering that they were obviously created only under the authority of
Corp. U.S. Two months later Corp. U.S'. Congress entered their 17th
Amendment as ratified. Again in the corporate ratification pattern of the
Corp. U.S. 16th amendment was followed with actual State ratification. This
amendment is not even constitutional; the Constitution forbids Congress
from even discussing the matter of where Senators are elected. For our
national Congress to pass such an Amendment they would first have to Amend
the Constitution to allow their discussion of the matter. Either way the
result is that in Corp. U.S. their corporate officials known as Senators
would thereafter be elected by a popular vote of their contracted voting
public, while in the actual government (hereinafter "original jurisdiction
government") Senators would continue to be appointed by the State's
Legislature or by the State's Governor. In other words, the Corp. U.S.
seats and the original jurisdiction government seats would not thereafter
be seated by the same individual.
In 1914, the Freshman class and all Senators that successfully ran for
reelection in 1913 by popular vote are seated in Corp. U.S. capacity only
and the original jurisdiction Senate seat was vacated, because the States
failed to appoint new Senators (after all no law compels them to).
In 1917, Corp. U.S. enters W.W.I and passes their Trading with the Enemies
Act.
In 1918, President Wilson is reelected by the Electoral College but their
election is required to be confirmed by the constitutionally set Senate;
where the new Corp. U.S. only Senators were allowed to participate in the
Electoral College vote confirmation the only authority that could possibly
have been used for electoral confirmation was corporate only. Therefore,
President Wilson was not confirmed into office for his second term as
President of the United States of America and was only seated in the Corp.
U.S. Presidential capacity. Therefore the original jurisdiction
government's seats were vacated because the people didn't seat any original
jurisdiction government officers.
In 1933, Corp. U.S. went bankrupt and the States agreed to support their
resolution. In keeping with the bankruptcy, the Corp. U.S. Congress
adjusted their Trading with the Enemies Act with their Emergency War Powers
Act, which recognized the people of the United States of America are
enemies of Corp. U.S.
No Elections since 1913
Therefore there was no election of officers of the government of the United
States of America. And all of America was none the wiser. The government
was still there and the Constitution was still alive and well and living in
Washington, D.C. but once again** there was nobody sitting in the seats of
the officers of government; just like it was when the founding fathers
signed the Constitution but the States had not ratified it, the government
existed but no one was seated in office.
There hasn't been an Election since, and there won't be one until America
once again wakes up.
This is fantastic, I know, but look at the facts! This is the only solution
that makes sense and fits the facts.
[Continued]
Bill Shoots 02-12-2005 05:13 PM
----------
USA, Inc. - Abstract - 2 of 3
[Continuing]
=======================================
Bill Shoots 02-12-2005 05:13 PM
----------
USA, Inc. - Abstract - 2 of 3
[Continuing]
The U.N., IMF, & World Bank
So we jump from 1913 and the setting of the Federal Reserv
Main Page - Wednesday, 03/09/05
Message Board by American Patriot Friends Network [APFN]
