WHY SOCIAL SECURITY IS NOT IN TROUBLE....
1 IN 3 WILL DIE MUCH YOUNGER BECASUE WE HAVE 'FAT' CHILDREN...
THANKS TO BIG MAC...ETC!
===================
Why Women Live Longer than Men
By William J. Cromie - October 01, 1998
Gazette Staff - Harvard's Office of News
http://www.news.harvard.edu/gazette/1998/10.01/WhyWomenLiveLon.html
Studying people who live 100 years and more leads Harvard researchers to
conclude that menopause is a major determinant of the life spans of both women
and men.
Women's life span depends on the balance of two forces, according to Thomas
Perls, a geriatrician at Harvard Medical School. One is the evolutionary drive
to pass on her genes, the other is the need to stay healthy enough to rear as
many children as possible. "Menopause draws the line between the two," Perls
says. It protects older women from the risks of bearing children late in life,
and lets them live long enough to take care of their children and
grandchildren.
As for men, Perls believes "their purpose is simply to carry genes that ensure
longevity and pass them on to their daughters. Thus, female longevity becomes
the force that determines the natural life span of both men and women."
"Most animals do not undergo menopause," adds Ruth Fretts, an
obstetrician-gynecologist at Harvard-affiliated Beth Israel Deaconess Medical
Center in Boston. "It seems that menopause evolved in part as a response to
the amount of time that the young remain dependent on adults to ensure their
survival."
Pilot whales, for example, suckle their young until age 14, and they, along
with humans, are two of the few species that menstruate.
Human females eventually become so frail that bearing children involves a high
risk of death. Earlier in evolution, that was as young as 35 to 40 years old.
"Anyone who developed a genetic alteration that caused infertility, i.e.,
menopause, obtained a survival advantage over females who continued to be
fertile and died bearing children," Perls says.
The Gender Gap
This reasoning, however, does not explain why women live so much longer than
men. "In all developed countries and most undeveloped ones, women outlive men,
sometimes by a margin of 10 years," Perls and Fretts note. "In the U.S.,
average life expectancy at birth is about 79 years for women and about 72
years for men."
The gender gap is most pronounced in those who live 100 years or more. Among
centenarians worldwide, women outnumber males nine to one. Perls and Fretts
are studying all centenarians from eight cities and towns around Boston, 100
people in all. Eighty-five are women.
The mortality gap varies during other stages of life. Between ages 15 and 24
years, men are four to five times more likely to die than women. This time
frame coincides with the onset of puberty and an increase in reckless and
violent behavior in males. Researchers refer to it as a "testosterone storm."
Most deaths in this male group come from motor vehicle accidents, followed by
homicide, suicide, cancer, and drownings.
After age 24, the difference between male and female mortality narrows until
late middle age. In the 55- to 64-year-old range, more men than women die, due
mainly to heart disease, suicide, car accidents, and illnesses related to
smoking and alcohol use. Heart disease kills five of every 1,000 men in this
age group.
"It seems likely that women have been outliving men for centuries and perhaps
longer," say Perls and Fretts. Even with the sizable risk conferred by
childbirth, women have outsurvived men at least since the 1500s. Although, in
the United States between 1900 and the 1930s, the death risk for women of
childbearing age was as high as that for men. Since then, improved health
care, particularly in childbirth, has put women ahead of men again in the
survival struggle, as well as raising life expectancy for both sexes.
A longer life doesn't necessarily mean a healthier life, however. While men
succumb to fatal illnesses like heart disease, stroke, and cancer, women live
on with non-fatal conditions such as arthritis, osteoporosis, and diabetes.
"While men die from their diseases, women live with them," Perls comments.
One contributor to the gender difference in life span is the influence of sex
hormones. The male hormone testosterone not only increases aggressive and
competitive behavior in young men, it increases levels of harmful cholesterol
(low-density lipoprotein), raising a male's chances of getting heart disease
or stroke.
On the other hand, the female hormone estrogen lowers harmful cholesterol and
raises "good" cholesterol (high-density lipoprotein). Emerging evidence
suggests estrogen treatment after menopause reduces the risk of dying from
heart disease and stroke, as well as of dying in general.
Perls and Fretts believe that longer life means survival of the fittest, and
women, evolutionarily speaking, are more fit than men. The longer a woman
lives and the more slowly she ages, the more offspring she can produce and
rear to adulthood. Therefore, evolution would naturally select the genes of
such women over those who die young.
Long-lived men would also have an evolutionary advantage over their
shorter-lived brethren. However, says Perls, "studies of chimps, gorillas, and
other species closely related to humans suggest that a male's reproductive
capacity is actually limited more by access to females than by life span. And
because men have not been involved in child care as much as females, survival
of a man's offspring, and thus his genes, depended not so much on how long he
lived, but on how long the mother of his children lived."
In their studies of centenarians, Perls and Fretts found that a surprising
number of women who lived to be 100 or more gave birth in their forties. These
100-year-old women were four times as likely to have given birth in their
forties as women born in the same year who died at age 73. A study of
centenarians in Europe by the Max Planck Institute of Demography in Germany
found the same relationship between longevity and fecundity.
This does not mean that having a child in middle age makes a woman live
longer. Rather, Perls says, "the factors that allow certain older women to
bear children -- a slow rate of aging and decreased susceptibility to disease
-- also improve a woman's chances of living a long time. Extending that idea,
we argue that the driving force of human life span is maximizing the time
during which woman can bear children. The age at which menopause eliminates
the threat of female survival by ending further reproduction may therefore be
the determinant of subsequent life span."
Closing the Gap
If this is true, then the genes of female centenarians hold the secrets of a
longer, healthier life. And these are no ordinary genes. Whether the average
person drinks, smokes, exercises, or eats her vegetables adds or subtracts
five to ten years to or from her life. But to live an additional 30 years
requires the kind of genes that slow down aging and reduce susceptibility to
conditions such as Alzheimer's disease, stroke, heart disease, and cancer.
Clues about what those genes are and how they work could come from studying
those who survive 100 years or more, Perls believes. The New England
Centenarian Study he runs is the only scientific investigation of the oldest
oldsters being done in the United States. He has now expanded it to include
all centenarians in the city of Boston, about 100 more people.
"We think that centenarians are a tremendous resource for the discovery of
genes responsible for aging and the ways in which aging occurs," says Perls.
"Finding these genes could lead to testing people and determining who might be
disposed to accelerated aging via diseases such as Alzheimer's, cancer, heart
disease, and stroke. Such individuals might eventually be treated to extend
the prospect of their living longer."
The oldest person for which reliable records exist was a woman who recently
died in France at the age of 123. "Reaching such an age is like winning the
lottery," Perls comments. "The odds are about one in 6 billion. From a
practical point of view, we can consider 100 years as the average maximum of
human life. We're not there yet, of course. At present, average life
expectancy for those born after 1960 is about 85 years."
Although women can expect to live longer than men, the gap is closing. Death
rates have begun to converge in the past 20 years. Some researchers attribute
the convergence to women taking on the behaviors and stresses formerly
considered the domain of males -- smoking, drinking, and working outside the
home.
For example, Perls and Fretts point out that deaths from lung cancer have
almost tripled in women in the past 20 years. One study concluded that, on
average, middle-aged female smokers live no longer than male smokers.
"Smoking," Perls and Fretts conclude, "seems to be the 'great equalizer.'"
=======================================
Research Notebook--January-February 2005 FDA Consumer
... colorectal cancer death rates among men and women ... the variability in
cancer incidence and death rates across ... nearly 25 pounds heavier on
average, according to a ...
http://www.fda.gov/fdac/departs/2005/105_note.html
Death has a contract on everyone, but 20th-century Americans have renegotiated
the deal. A baby girl born in the US. in 1900 could expect to live years in
2000, she will expect to live almost 80 years. Thanks to advances in medicine,
sanitation, and basic nutrition, the annual age-adjusted death rate per
100,000 Americans will decline from 2,296 in 1900 to a projected 731 in 2000.
If this decline had never occurred, half of Americans alive in 2000 would
never have been born.
http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m4021/is_n4_v19/ai_19310644
======================================
The Worm in the Apple : How the Teacher Unions Are Destroying American
Education
by Peter Brimelow
Main Page - Friday, 02/08/05
Message Board by American
Patriot Friends Network [APFN]
APFN MESSAGEBOARD
ARCHIVES
