Plot Thickens -- 911 Holes In the Radar
http://www.the-movement.com/Radar/Radar.htm
9-11: Holes in the Radar
Frank Levi and Team 8+ (Feb 2005)
frank@the-movement.com
They cunningly exploited vulnerabilities in the radar that only the US Military and the FAA should have been aware of.
http://www.the-movement.com/
Read more about:
Flight 77 Did it reappear to the West?
Top 10 Pieces of Evidence
http://www.the-movement.com/
9 Keys to 9-11
http://www.the-movement.com/
Interview with FBI Whistle Blower about 9-11.
Although she has numerous gag orders Sibyl Edmonds gives a good insight into the huge web-like conspiracy that was 9-11. Cover-ups, protection of the guilty, involvement of multiple nations, drugs, money trails etc.
Why was the Fired Head of Saudi Intell in the US while 15 Saudis were Carrying Out their 9/11 Mission?
This is very interesting stuff most of which has been floating about in the background for some time. Here's a "conspiracy theory": The oil industry, facing the crisis of peak oil, asks the Bush family and their friends to sort it out. The Bush family ask their friends in the Saudi and Pakistani intelligence services to arrange the "hijackers" for Sept 11th. They pull some other strings to make sure there is no security in Logan airport and elsewhere. Some of the warnings about Bin Laden preparing a terror attack (that were obviously ignored) were deliberate red herrings to point the finger at the patsy.
http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=story_11-4-2004_pg7_6
We were going to kill Osama in 1999 but there were some UAE princes visiting. So why wasn't he killed after they went home?
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/chi-0403310198mar31,1,4149185.story?coll=chi-news-hed
HAMBURG, Germany -- Two private Saudi companies linked with suspected Al Qaeda cells here and in Indonesia also have connections to the Saudi Arabian intelligence agency and its longtime chief, Prince Turki bin Faisal, according to information assembled by German intelligence analysts.
Is Al Qaeda really a mixture of Saudi, Pakistani and US intelligence agents?
Some speculation about the big fireball when Flight 175 hit
http://www.119-questions.com
Outstanding site - I was considering doing something similar based on "Who wants to be a millionaire but never got round to it.
A piece by Norwegian investigator K. Robjoe about the mysterious piece of debris photographed in front of the pentagon. I would be interested in comments on this.
Over the past couple of years I've read so much about Flight 77 not hitting the Pentagon that I'm pretty much convinced (after initial scepticism)
http://davesweb.cnchost.com/nwsltr7.html
This piece emphasises the very important point that whatever hit the pentagon made a small hole which penetrated through 6 reinforced concrete walls.
I think a good way of working out what the damage should really look like would be to divide the plane up into one foot segments. Work out the mass of each one foot segment of the plane, allow for deceleration as the plane is absorbed by the building (if there is any?) and work out the momentum of each section. Or something like that. Then draw a graph.
Further analysis
Details about the Pentagon Renovations prior to 9-11
http://www.virginiabusiness.com/magazine/yr2001/dec01/pentagon.shtml
http://www.govexec.com/dailyfed/0901/091701kp2.htm
"steel-reinforced walls, blast-resistant windows and Kevlar panels"
“Despite the obvious huge pressures to which this glass was exposed, the glass is still intact,” Evey said. “Even though the building eventually collapsed, the pieces of glass are still, for the most part, in a single piece. They just kind of popped out as the building came down.”
Details about renovations after 9-11. Each blast resistant window weighs 1600 lbs
http://www.techtv.com/news/specialreport/terrorism/story/0,24195,3398791,00.html
Nuclear Energy Institute concludes that a fully loaded 767 (heavier than Flight 77) could not breach the 3.5 ft steel reinforced concrete walls of a nuclear fuel containment building Full story
http://members.aol.com/mpwright9/sting.html
One of the hijackers booked their ticket in the University of Oklahoma library. He consulted with the librarian who advised him that the person who booked the ticket was a white American male. Smoking gun anyone? Some interesting theories about a sting operation.
Ongoing investigation into the flights: Operation 9-11: Find the Rendezvous Points
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,34184,00.html
Old Fox News article from Sept 11th 2001 containing more evidence that Flight 93 was trying to land.
"The Somerset County airport, where Flight 93 plane may have trying to land, is a small, rural facility that does not handle such aircraft. "
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2001/09/11/national/main310743.shtml
Changed plans
That these 33 souls ended up on the same early-morning flight, like ironic stories from other ill-fated flights, was happenstance.
Mr. Glick, a sales and marketing executive for an Internet company, was supposed to have flown to the West Coast a day earlier. But a construction fire at Newark International Airport meant he couldn't depart on time, and a later flight would have landed him in San Francisco at 3 a.m. He opted instead for the first flight out Tuesday, Flight 93.
Mr. Burnett was booked on a flight for later Tuesday, but he wanted to get home early to be with Deena and the girls, 5-year-old twins and a 3-year-old.
Mark Bingham was supposed to fly out a day earlier, but he was sick. The owner of The Bingham Group, a public relations firm with offices in San Francisco and New York, had a scheduled Tuesday afternoon meeting in San Francisco. He had no choice but to book Flight 93.
http://www.westchestergov.com/airport/radar_flight_tracking_system.htm
live flight tracker at Westchester airport - closest aiport to the last blip on the Flight 175 map
Exact location of McGuire Air Base
Exact location of Westchester Airport
fire coming out of Flight 175 at the front? This would be a naphthalene charge going off? (contributed by a reader)
I can confirm the fire at Newark Airport on September 10, 2001.
Email from a reader:
My wife and I were on a flight that day from DFW to Newark which arrived, to the best
of my knowledge, about 1:45 pm or so. We were put into a holding pattern for about
10 to 12 minutes because of a fire at an airplane hanger, the pilot announced
in the passenger cabin.
I, like many, are convinced that the planes flown into the WTC were not the originally
scheduled airliners taking off from Logan. And of course you've probably seen the
article about the bomb on the underside of Flgt#175 at the serendipity website.
While I've read some speculation as in the above referenced article about landing
the real scheduled flight and off-loading the passengers, there really hasn't been
a convincing scenario thought up yet about what happened to the real flights and
passengers.
The only things I can think of to explain the original flight is that the passengers
may have been in on the whole operation and they were off-loaded at a military
air base somewhere along the flight path. Or there may have been a change of
flight numbers and gates at Logan providing confusion to passengers as to what
flight they were actually on. I know I've been through the gate shuffle on flights
many times. Who really remembers a flight number anyway. You remember
your destination and flight time and you use that information to read your gate
number off the monitor. Then you may be shifted to another gate when you arrive
at that gate.
Keep up the good work
Sal
Responses to rendezvous points - some very interesting points from readers.
Thanks for all the very kind comments
Thanks also to all the people who pointed out the embarrassing typos. Too many late nights...
Some additional information on airbases and airfields thanks to Neal
Investigation Progress
07 August 2003
Operation 9-11: Find the Rendezvous Points
An important new piece with some speculation as to how the attacks could have been carried out and a comparison with Operation Northwoods
http://www.the-movement.com/
US Military please note: this text is not intended to offend the good people in the US Military. The implications of the article are that 9-11 was staged by elements of the US Government/Military but it is very unlikely that it involved the normal people in the military whose only intention is to protect their country.
Since 9-11, many people have wondered how it was possible that the four hijacked planes on 9-11 were able to cause such confusion and chaos without any significant response from America's air defences (NORAD). Even more amazing is the fact that a hijacked plane was able to both penetrate and attack within the protected air space around Washington DC.
It is already well established that the planners of 9-11 were aware of and possibly taking advantage of the military exercises and terror drills taking place on and around that day. (See War Games and Terror Drills under additional reading)
What we have discovered is that whoever planned and implemented 9-11 must have had detailed knowledge of both the NORAD and FAA radar coverage. They cunningly exploited vulnerabilities in the radar that only the US Military and the FAA should have been aware of. The 9-11 commission only skimmed the surface of these issues, using them as a means to draw blame away from the FAA and NORAD.
Another important question is why the hijackers took such long illogical routes to get to their targets. Why, for example, was Flight 93 not crashed into the World Trade Centre, which was in sight of the airport?
Analysis of the flight paths reveals the possibility that the planes were switched for substitute "drone" planes, operated by remote control and loaded with explosives to cause maximum damage. Although this is somewhat speculative, it is important to point out the anomalies in the flight paths that might lead us to consider this scenario. If you are unfamiliar with "plane-swapping" and "remote controlled plane" theories, please refer to Appendix C (Operation Northwoods and Remote Controlled Planes)
Before reading on, you may wish to review the appendices for an explanation of technical terms and some notes on the graphical techniques used throughout this piece.
It is also well worth reading the following article from the Washington Post. They explain in detail about why Flight 77 disappeared from the radar screen, leading the air traffic controller to believe that this flight had crashed.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn?pagename=article&node&contentId=A32597-2001Nov2
Sources showing radar sites and coverage
(Click thumbnails for a larger image)
http://www.the-movement.com/Radar/Radar.htm
Message Board by American Patriot Friends Network [APFN]