Bush's Social Security Scam:
" HOW WOULD PERSONAL ACCOUNTS WORK?
Under the current system, workers generally contribute 6.2% of their wages to
the Social Security system. Under Bush's plan, you would eventually be able to
divert as much as 4% into a personal investment account that could be invested
among a limited number of government-selected funds. "
[ You can bet your rear end that THOSE "government-selected funds" have been
selected by Bush's Corporate and Wall Street buddies! They're going to "LET"
you invest 4% of YOUR hard earned Social Security dollars into an account of
THEIR CHOOSING!!!
Anyone who buys into Bush's Social Security scam - which is being pushed
behind the scenes by the corporations and Wall Street - is either braindead or
a blooming moron. ]
Source
http://www.time.com/time/magazine/printout/0,8816,1025164,00.html
Sunday, Feb. 06, 2005
The 4% Solution
The President has begun to spell out the details of his plan to let workers
invest part of their Social Security taxes. How would it work for you?
By KAREN TUMULTY; JOHN F. DICKERSON
George W. Bush prides himself on keeping his focus on the big picture. But
when a challenge is as tall as transforming Social Security, the details can
kill you. As the President warned last week in his State of the Union address
that the system is "collapsing"—an assertion many experts dispute—the White
House offered the first glimpse of his most radical proposal for changing it:
allowing younger workers to invest part of their payroll taxes in private
accounts.
The plan that was unveiled did nothing to change the political obstacles Bush
faces in Washington. Republicans are still skeptical; Democrats are still
opposed. So the President took his sales pitch on the road to five
conservative states represented by Democrats in the Senate. His Cabinet will
fan out across the country as well. Will they succeed? That may depend on how
satisfied Americans are when they get answers to their questions about Bush's
idea for reforming the biggest and most popular social program ever.
HOW WOULD PERSONAL ACCOUNTS WORK?
Under the current system, workers generally contribute 6.2% of their wages to
the Social Security system. Under Bush's plan, you would eventually be able to
divert as much as 4% into a personal investment account that could be invested
among a limited number of government-selected funds. The account could not be
spent or borrowed against until retirement. At retirement, you would still get
a traditional Social Security check, but it would be smaller, reflecting your
diminished contribution to the system. You would also be required to commit a
portion of your personal account to an annuity—to trade in the assets for a
guaranteed monthly payment for the rest of your life. Your annuity commitment
would have to be large enough that the monthly proceeds plus your Social
Security check would keep you at least above the poverty line. Any money left
over in your personal account could be used as you wished--taken as a lump
sum, drawn down over time, added to your annuity or even left invested to
continue growing. By most estimates, if a personal account earned annualized
investment gains of 3% (after inflation was factored in), it would produce
roughly the same retirement income as Social Security provides under existing
rules. Investment gains above that level would give you a surplus in your
private account; smaller gains would leave you with less to live on.
WHO WOULD BE ELIGIBLE FOR A PERSONAL ACCOUNT?
The accounts would be available to workers born in 1950 or later and would be
phased in over three years, starting in 2009. People born in 1965 or earlier
could start investing the first year; those born in 1978 or earlier could
begin in 2010; and all younger workers could begin in 2011. Those 55 and older
would continue to be covered by Social Security in the traditional manner.
HOW MUCH COULD I INVEST?
Initially, the amount would be limited to $1,000 annually, but according to
Bush's plan, it would rise by $100 a year, to a maximum of 4% of your income.
COULD I INVEST IN THAT REALLY HOT STOCK MY BROTHER-IN-LAW HAS BEEN TOUTING?
No. Investors' choices would be limited, much as they are under the Thrift
Savings Plan now available to federal-government workers, who can invest in
five broad, general funds: a large-cap stock fund, a small-cap stock fund, an
international stock fund, a corporate-bond fund and a Treasury-bond fund. The
government would also offer what is called a life-cycle fund, in which the mix
of investments changes according to the investor's age. None of those options
are particularly sexy, but because they are more diversified than individual
stocks and bonds, they are less likely to suffer quick, crippling losses. They
also cut down on the government's costs of administering the program.
WHAT ABOUT INHERITANCE? COULD I LEAVE THE MONEY IN MY PERSONAL ACCOUNT TO MY
KIDS?
If you should die before reaching retirement, all the money would go to your
heirs. If you should die after you retire, they could inherit only that
portion of your personal account that had not been committed to an annuity.
They would not receive any payout from the annuity.
WOULD INDIVIDUAL INVESTMENT ACCOUNTS REDUCE THE FUTURE INSOLVENCY PROBLEMS
FACING SOCIAL SECURITY?
No. In the next few decades they would actually make the problem worse. That's
because the money that workers would invest in their personal accounts would
no longer be available to pay the benefits of today's retirees. As things now
stand, Social Security is expected in 2018 to start paying out more in
benefits than it brings in from payroll taxes. If individual accounts were
established and no other reform was enacted, the system's finances would
deteriorate even faster and the shortfall would begin six years earlier, in
2012, according to the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, a liberal think
tank whose numbers are widely respected.
Additional "transition costs"—amounting to trillions of dollars—would be
incurred in the early decades. The Bush Administration argues that those costs
would eventually be offset by savings in future decades, when people who
invest in personal accounts begin to retire and get smaller Social Security
payouts than they otherwise would receive. In the meantime, huge new borrowing
would be needed to cover the gap left over by the transition. Paying back that
debt would fall to the same future generations that Bush says he's trying to
protect by revamping Social Security.
SO HOW WOULD BUSH FIX SOCIAL SECURITY'S LONG-TERM FUNDING PROBLEM?
That remains the big unanswered question. Everyone in Washington knows it
would be political suicide to cut the benefits of today's retirees or those
about to retire. Absent those options, there are only three ways to bring the
system into fiscal balance: cut future benefits, raise taxes or borrow the
money, which adds to the debt.
In his State of the Union address, Bush cited four types of benefit cuts that
are "on the table." One under serious consideration is changing the formula
for calculating initial benefits, basing them on inflation rather than
faster-rising wages. What this technical-sounding change would mean is smaller
Social Security checks. For instance, according to a 2002 analysis by the
chief actuary's office at Social Security, a 38-year-old earning $35,000 would
now expect to receive $1,343 a month when she retires at 65, but with indexing
to inflation, that benefit would drop 18.2%, meaning she would get $1,099.
Given the existing system's long-term funding challenges, of course, that kind
of cut could happen anyway. —With reporting by Perry Bacon Jr./Washington
=======================
SOCIAL INSECURITY
New York Post, NY - Feb 6, 2005
... If President Bush's plans for Social Security become law ... Last October,
this column put the spotlight on a whole new stock-market mega-scam in which
rings ...
MORE:>>
==========================
Support the Warrior Not the War: Give Them Their Benefits!
... The Veteran's Administration, plagued by recent budget cuts, has had to
resort to charging new veterans entering into its system a yearly fee of $250
in ...
MORE:>>
==========================
China Daily Powerful Republicans Worry About Bush Budget Cuts
Reuters - 3 hours ago
... Bush's budget already seeks $45 billion in Medicaid savings over 10 years.
These mandatory programs account for around 55 percent of the budget. ...
High-Powered Influence May Prevent Bush's Budget Cuts ABC News
Dems Attack Bush's $2.57 Trillion Budget San Francisco Chronicle
Bush: Budget Cuts Part of Broader Economic Agenda Los Angeles Times
(subscription)
Los Angeles Times (subscription) - Age (subscription) -
all 2,249 related »
===============================
President proposes deep cuts in budget
Seattle Post Intelligencer, WA - 19 hours ago
... Veterans would also feel the effect of Bush's budget. ... members of
Congress said the budget proposal contained ... surprises, a tacit admission
that Bush delivered a ...
State Reaction: Bush plan would force BPA to sell at going rate The
Register-Guard
all 67 related »
=========================
Main Page - Friday, 02/08/05
Message Board by American
Patriot Friends Network [APFN]
APFN MESSAGEBOARD
ARCHIVES
