Nicole TerryBritain Owns US/ Pope Owns and Controls BritainWed Feb 2, 2005 06:23126.96.36.199
Britain Owns US/ Pope Owns and Controls Britain
From Nicole Terry | firstname.lastname@example.org
Please read indepth article supporting the facts in this report: http://www.avoiceforchildren.com/news/2002/November/queen_is_exposed.htm
Thank you Rebekah Sutherland for this comprehensive article outlining the relationships between the contracts of England and the United States, a corporate scheme from the beginning. In l997 when the Social Securities document was discovered coming from the Queens Post Office, we had just started our website and had a copy of the original of the document referred to below on our site then.
In l997 a handful of scholars were saying the BAR was the core of the fraud we were all running into. People said they were "fringe" outcasts, and ignored their research. Now the research as well as the actions of the BAR members have exposed patterns that are clear and certain that the International Bar Association, the British Bar Association, the American Bar Association and the state BAR's ARE the operatives of the global corporate scheme that has undermined the Sovereignty of the People, in the United States being the Bill of Rights that protects human Inherent Rights from agressions of outlaw or unconstitutional governments including our own.
Another part directly is the slavery issue, and the double standard of "law". The BAR agents and associates are all judges and attorneys and Big Corp CEO's. At the same time that the first Bank was created, a Treasury Court was created within Article II. Not an Article III court of general jurisdiction, or of the people, but a court of limited jurisdiction to hear commerce cases. Later, that Article II court was brought into the lawful jurisdiction of the Article III process. That court is called the Court of International Trade and sets in New York.
Today this is the only known Article III judges setting. All other courts are "established" in the "one supreme Court" BEING the Article III court. Please read on our website on Newswire more about this court. Bottom line in lay terms, the BAR has always and still been in control of the "courts" for monetary interests NOT the people. They have created a process for themselves which they enforce as well to be able to violate the public trust without appearing to break the law. It is all statutory fraud being enforced upon the slaves. When slavery was "abolished" all that was done was a new restricted status of "US Citizen" was created and state rights abolished and all became a corporate "state", one big company.
What was abolished was "involuntary servitude" but NOT VOLUNTARY SERVITUDE. They changed the language in all the states constitutions , amended to incorporate all kinds of "implied consent" compelled contracts on the freeborn sovereign people in the states. In order to sell this opression and not be blatant, it was sold to us as licenses, fines, taxes, all forms of statutory restrictions against freeborn innocent people. All that happened with that is they make you out of belief or fear to comply. That is all. And that is what the people in mass NOW must say NO to every bit of it to stop their outlaw human rendering machine. In court the agencies actually SAY that all infants are VOLUNTARY handed over to the state, and that all people forced into programs and fines, etc VOLUNTEER for these "services"..... like a business, but you dont get a choice to shop at some other store.....
At the end of this article is a link to another article, sent out last year when England foreclosed on US mortgages, after the federal courts failed to protect their interests. The schemes are public now, the racketeering and conflict of interest obscene. The first step is seeing it, the next to stop allowing it to continue. The humans are the sovereign authority, not corporate fictions and their representatives. It is up to us to excercise it, and force public servants and elected representatives and officials to submit to that UNLAIENABLE authority. pamela gaston, a voice for children
From: Becworks@aol.com URGENT: GET THIS TO AMERICAN CITIZENS
I have my copy of the treaty signed by Ben Franklin with the British Crown by which these things have come to pass. Forwarded by R.E. Sutherland, M.Ed. ************************************************************* Category: News & Opinion Topic: Constitution & Civil Liberties Synopsis: Legally, we're owned by the Pope-controlled Queen Elizabeth II ;live under Babylonian Talmudic law Source: APFN Published: April 9, 2001 Author: Stephen Ames For Education and Discussion Only. Not for Commercial Use.
Queen Elizabeth controls and has amended U.S. Social Security, as follows:
S.I. 1997 NO.1778 The Social Security ( United States of America) Order 1997 Made 22nd of July 1997 coming into force 1st September 1997. At the Court at Buckingham Palace the 22nd day of July 1997. Now, therefore Her Majesty an pursuance of section 179 (1) (a) and (2) of the Social Security Administration Act of 1992 and all other powers enabling Her in that behalf, is please, by and with advise of Her privy Council, to order, and it is hereby ordered as follows:
"This Order may be cited as the Social Security (United States of America) Order 1997 and shall come into force on 1st September 1997."
Does this give a new meaning to Federal Judge William Wayne Justice stating in court that he takes his orders from England? This order goes on to redefine words in the Social Security Act and makes some changes in United States Law.
Remember, King George was the "Arch-Treasurer and Prince Elector of the Holy Roman Empire and c, and of the United States of America." See: Treaty of Peace (1738) 8 U.S. Statutes at Large. Great Britain which is the agent for the Pope, is in charge of the USA 'plantation.'
What people do not know is that the so called Founding Fathers and King George were working hand-n-hand to bring the people of America to there knees, to install a Central Government over them and to bind them to a debt that could not be paid. First off you have to understand that the UNITED STATES is a corporation and that it existed before the Revolutionary war. See Respublica v. Sweers 1 Dallas 43. 28 U.S.C. 3002 (15)
Now, you also have to realize that King George was not just the King of England, he was also the King of France. Treaty of Peace * U.S. 8 Statutes at Large 80.
On January 22, 1783 Congress ratified a contract for the repayment of 21 loans that the UNITED STATES had already received dating from February 28, 1778 to July 5, 1782. Now the UNITED STATES Inc. owes the King money which is due January 1, 1788 from King George via France. Is this not incredible the King funded both sides of the War. But there was more work that needed to be done. Now the Articles of Confederation which was declared in force March 1, 1781 States in Article 12 " All bills of credit emitted, monies borrowed,and debts contracted by, or under the authority of Congress, before the assembling of the United States, in pursuance of the present confederation, shall be deemed and considered a charge against the United States, for payment and satisfaction whereof the said United States, and the public faith are hereby solemnly pledged."
Now after losing the Revolutionary War, even though the War was nothing more than a move to turn the people into debtors for the King, they were not done yet.
Now the loans were coming due and so a meeting was convened in Annapolis, Maryland, to discuss the economic instability of the country under the Articles of Confederation. Only five States come to the meeting, but there is a call for another meeting to take place in Philadelphia the following year with the express purpose of revising the Articles of Confederation
On February 21, 1787 Congress gave approval of the meeting to take place in Philadelphia on May 14, 1787, to revise the Articles of confederation. Something had to be done about the mounting debt. Little did the people know that the so called founding fathers were acutely going to reorganize the United States because it was Bankrupt.
On September 17, 1787 twelve State delegates approve the Constitution. The States have now become Constitutors. Constitutor: In the civil law, one who, by simple agreement, becomes responsible for the payment of another's debt. Blacks Law Dictionary 6th Ed. The States were now liable for the debt owed to the King, but the people of America were not because they were not a party to the Constitution because it was never put to them for a vote On August 4th, 1790 an Act was passed which was Titled.-An Act making provision for the payment of the Debt of the United States. This can be found at 1 U.S. Statutes at Large pages 138-178. This Act for all intents and purposes abolished the States and Created the Districts. If you don't believe it look it up. The Act set up Federal Districts, here in Pennsylvania we got two. In this Act each District was assigned a portion of the debt. The next step was for the states to reorganize their governments which most did in 1790. This had to be done because the States needed to legally bind the people to the debt. The original State Constitutions were never submitted to the people for a vote. So the governments wrote new constitutions and submitted them to people for a vote thereby binding the people to the debts owed to Great Britain. The people became citizens of the State where they resided and ipso facto a citizen of the United States. A citizen is a member of a fictional identity and it is synonymous with subject.
What you think is a state is in reality a corporation, in other words, a Person.
"Commonwealth of Pennsylvania is Person." 9 F. Supp 272 "Word "person" does not include state. 12 Op Atty Gen 176.
There are no states, just corporations. Every body politic on this planet is a corporation. A corporation is an artificial entity, a fiction at law. They only exist in your mind. They are images in your mind, that speak to you. We labor, pledge our property and give our children to a fiction.
Now before we go any further let us examine a few things in the Constitution.
Article six section one keeps the loans from the King valid it states; All Debts contracted and Engagements entered into, before the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be as valid against the United States under this constitution, as under the Confederation.
Another interesting tidbit can be found at Article One Section Eight clause Two which states that Congress has the power to borrow money on the credit of the United States. This was needed so the United States (Which went into Bankruptcy on January 1, 1788) could borrow money and then because the States were a party to the Constitution they would also be liable for it.
The next underhanded move was the creation of The United States Bank in 1791. This was a private Bank of which there were 25,000 shares issued of which 18,000 were held by those in England. The Bank loaned the United States money in exchange for Securities of the United States
Now the creditors of the United States which included the King wanted paid the Interest on the loans that were given to the United States. So Alexander Hamilton came up with the great idea of taxing alcohol.The people resisted so George Washington sent out the militia to collect the tax which they did. This has become known as the Whiskey rebellion. It is the Militia's duty to collect taxes. How did the United States collect taxes off of the people if the people are not a party to the Constitution? I'll tell you how. The people are slaves! The United States belongs to the floundering fathers and their posterity and Great Britain. America is nothing more than a Plantation. It always has been. How many times have you seen someone in court attempt to use the Constitution and then the Judge tells him he can't. It is because you are not a party to it. We are SLAVES!!!!!!! If you don't believe read Padelford, Fay & Co. vs. The Mayor and Aldermen of the City of Savannah.
14 Georgia 438, 520 which states " But, indeed, no private person has a right to complain, by suit in court, on the ground of a breach of the Constitution, the Constitution, it is true, is a compact but he is not a party to it."
Now back to the Militia. Just read Article One Section Eight clause (15) which states that it is the militia's job to execute the laws of the Union. Now read Clause (16) Which states that Congress has the power to provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining the Militia, and for governing such part of them as may be employed in the service of the United States.... the Militia is not there to protect you and me, it is their to collect our substance.
As you can plainly see all the Constitution did is set up a Military Government to guard the King's commerce and make us slaves.
If one goes to 8 U.S. statutes at large 116-132 you will find "The Treaty of Amity, Commerce and Navigation. This Treaty was signed on November 19th, 1794 which was twelve years after the War. Article 2 of the Treaty states that the King's Troops were still occupying the United States. Being the nice King that he was , he decided that the troops would return to England by June 1st, 1796. The troops were still on American soil because, quite frankly the King wanted them here.
Here is the key to were this started:
Many people tend to blame the Jews for our problems. Jewish Law governs the entire world, as found in Jewish Law by MENACHEM ELON, DEPUTY PRESIDENT SUPREME COURT OF ISRAEL, to wit:
"Everything in the Babylonian Talmud is binding on all Israel. Every town and country must follow all customs, give effect to the decrees, and carry out the enactment's of the Talmudic sages, because the entire Jewish people accepted everything contained in Talmud. The sages who adopted the enactment's and decrees, instituted the practices, rendered the decisions, and derived the laws, constituted all or most of the Sages of Israel. It is they who received the tradition of the fundamentals of the entire Torah in unbroken succession going back to Moses, our teacher."
We are living under what the Bible calls Mammon. As written in the subject Index, Mammon is defined as ("Civil law and procedure").
Now turn to the "The Shetars Effect on English Law" -- A Law of the Jews Becomes the Law of the Land, found in "The George Town Law Journal, Vol 71: pages 1179-1200." It is clearly stated in the Law Review that the Jews are the property of the Norman and Anglo-Saxon Kings. It also explains that the Talmud is the law of the land. It explains how the Babylonian Talmud became the law of the land, which is now known as the Uniform Commercial Code. The written credit agreement -- the Jewish shetar is a lien on all property (realty) and today it's called the mortgage! The treatise also explains that the Jews are owned by Great Britain and the Jews are in charge of the Baking system.
We are living under the Babylonian Talmud, it is were all of our problems come from. It was brought into England in 1066 and has been enforced by the Pope, Kings and the Christian churches ever since. It is total and relentless mind control, people are taught to believe in things that do not exist.
Now before you scream that the UCC is unconstitutional I'm sorry people, you are not a party to any constitution. Read the case cite below.
"But, indeed, no private person has a right to complain, by suit in court, on the ground of a breach of the Constitution. The Constitution it is true, is a compact, but he is not a party to it." Padelford, Fay & Co., vs. Mayor and Aldermen of the City of Savannah 14 Ga. 438, 520
You have to understand that Great Britain,(Article six Section one) the United States and the States are the parties to the Constitution not you. Let me try to explain. If I buy an automobile from a man and that automobile has a warranty and the engine blows up the first day I have it. Then I tell the man just forget about it. Then you come along and tell the man to pay me and he says no. So you take him to court for not holding up the contract. The court then says case dismissed. Why ? Bec
Main Page - Friday, 02/04/05
Message Board by American Patriot Friends Network [APFN]
APFN MESSAGEBOARD ARCHIVES