Robert Scheer
Bush Was All Too Willing to Use Émigrés' Lies
Wed Sep 3 11:18:58 2003
67.1.139.101

From The Los Angeles Times, 9/2/03:
http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/la-oe-scheer2sep02,1,800263.column

Bush Was All Too Willing to Use Émigrés' Lies

American experts urged the White House to be skeptical, but they hit a
stone wall.

By Robert Scheer


Oops.

There are no weapons of mass destruction after all.

That's the emerging consensus of the second team of weapons sleuths
commanded by the U.S. in Iraq, as reported last week in the Los
Angeles Times.

The 1,400-member Iraq Survey Group found what the first wave of U.S.
military experts and the United Nations inspectors before them
discovered -- nada.

Nothing, not a vial of the 38,000 liters of botulinum toxin or the
25,000 liters of anthrax or an ounce of the materials for the 500 tons
of sarin, mustard and VX nerve agent claimed by George W. Bush in his
State of the Union speech as justification for war.

Nor any sign of the advanced nuclear weapons program, a claim based on
a now-admitted forgery.

Nor has anyone produced any evidence of ties between the deposed
Hussein regime and the Al Qaeda terrorists responsible for 9/11.

The entire adventure was an immense fraud.

"We were prisoners of our own beliefs," a senior U.S. weapons expert
who worked with the Iraq Survey Group told The Times.

"We said Saddam Hussein was a master of denial and deception. Then
when we couldn't find anything, we said that proved it, instead of
questioning our own assumptions."

How distressing that it turns out to be Bush, leader of the world's
greatest democracy, who is the true master of denial and deception,
rather than Hussein, who proved to be a paper tiger.

Bush is such a master at deceiving the American public that even now
he is not threatened with the prospect of impeachment or any serious
congressional investigation into the possibility that he led this
nation into war with lies.

But lie he did, at the very least in the crucial matter of pushing
secret evidence that even a president of his limited experience had to
know was so flimsy as to not be evidence at all. U.S. intelligence
officials now say the administration was lied to by Iraqi émigrés.

That excuse for the U.S. intelligence failure in Iraq would be
laughable were the circumstances not so appalling.

It means Bush ignored all the cautions of career diplomats and
intelligence experts in every branch of the U.S. government over the
unsubstantiated word of Iraqi renegades.

Clearly, the administration, from the president on down, did not want
expert advice and intelligence that would have undermined its excuse
for invading Iraq.

This was a shell game from beginning to end in which Americans'
legitimate fear of terrorism after Sept. 11 was almost immediately and
cynically exploited by the neoconservative gang that runs U.S. foreign
policy.

American soldiers standing guard over the White House's imperial
ambitions -- a new Middle East as linchpin to a new world order -- are
now being shot like fish in a barrel.

Had Congress dared question Bush's claim of an immediate Iraqi
military threat, there would have been no excuse for invasion.

But Congress is kept on a tight leash by Republican leaders,
subverting its basic role as a check and balance on executive power.

Shame on congressional Democrats, especially those running for
president, who went along with this disgusting charade.

In the disarray and dissolution of the U.S. role as leader of the free
world, we sadly witness America's pathetic and isolated effort to rule
Iraq with some of the same émigrés who deceived us with the false
information that led us into a war that suited their ambitions.

One of those Iraqi exile leaders who clearly misled the U.S., Ahmad
Chalabi, is now a senior figure in the fig-leaf Iraqi shadow
government in U.S.-colonized Baghdad.

Chalabi is a fugitive from Jordan, where he was convicted of major
financial fraud, and he has no real base of support in Iraq.

But Bush still backs him, trafficking all too easily with a liar who
tells him what he wants to hear.

The British public, raised on a higher standard of official honesty,
is properly shocked. Prime Minister Tony Blair is in deep trouble as
Parliament and a high judge are embarked on a truth-finding
investigation into their government's rationale regarding the reasons
for war.

On Friday, Blair's media spokesman, Alistair Campbell, accused by the
BBC of "sexing up" the intelligence data used to justify going to war
with Iraq, suddenly resigned.

The Brits don't like being fooled.

That's not the case in the United States, where for too many pundits
and politicians, accepting official mendacity has become a mark of
political sophistication.

More American soldiers have died since Bush declared the war over than
during the war itself.

This misadventure is costing nearly $4 billion a month just for the
troops, and billions more for reconstruction by U.S. companies like
Dick Cheney's old firm Halliburton.

But too many Americans betray the proud tradition of an independent
citizenry by buying into the "aw shucks" irresponsibility of a
president who daily does a grave injustice to the awesome obligations
of the office that he has sworn -- in the name of God, no less -- to
uphold.