R. Anderson
FBI CoverUp of Key 911 Crash Facts;
Sun May 11 01:42:11 2003

FBI CoverUp of Key 911 Crash Facts; McGuire AFB Ordered to STAND DOWN on
911 Intercepts

= = = = = = = =
Joel Skousen's World Affairs Brief

by Joel Skousen

In all major conspiratorial events, evidence related to the event
continues to surface over time, and if the government is involved, it
demonstrates its collusion by the degree to which it attempts to
suppress and cover up the emerging evidence. As in the JFK assassination
and the downing of TWA 800 by a missile, we are beginning to see the
same pattern of obfuscation, denial, and cover-up by federal agencies in
the September 11th tragedy--especially by the FBI, the military, and the FAA.

Some of the biggest questions about the events of 9/11 center around the
hijacking of the various airliners: how the pilots reacted, and what
actions the government took via the military to impede the results.
Pilots have instant access to Air Traffic Control (ATC) with a push of a
button on the control yoke. In contrast, it takes time for a hijacker to
take over the cabin and then deal with the pilots who are in a separate
compartment behind a locked aluminum sliding door. We know, by FAA
admission, that in each and every case the pilots had time to
communicate their emergency to ATC. In at least two cases the pilots
were able to change the transponder code to 7700 for "emergency in
progress" before the hijackers took control and switched off the
transponder. The FAA and US military have standing orders and written
procedures on how to intercept and deal with aircraft hijackings.

The FAA has said that it alerted military authorities in Colorado at the
first signs of a hijacking. Yet we know that a few aircraft were
scrambled and that all others were grounded and prohibited from reacting
according to standing procedures. One of my subscribers is friends with
an air traffic controller at McGuire AFB in New Jersey. His friend
confided to him that "he was on duty at the time of the crashes into the
towers. They got a phone call in between the first and second 'hit'. His
superior told him that 'NO take-off's were permitted ... NONE at all.'"
This was too early to be a direct result of shutting down all flights
nationwide--which only affected private and commercial flights--not
military. Here we have evidence of the US military acting in direct
opposition to national defense--acting on orders from above. These
orders couldn't have come from Bush, who was engaged at an elementary
school, so higher military officials were either taking orders from
someone else at the White House or acting on predetermined orders.

I find it also very strange that flight data and voice recorders from
all the 9/11 crashes except Flight 93 (which crashed or was shot down
over Pennsylvania) have been declared not found, destroyed, or
unreadable. These declarations are without precedent in aviation
accident history, and especially preposterous when we consider that the
FBI claims to have found letters, passports and other fragile documents
belonging to the supposed Arab hijackers amidst the tons of rubble of
the WTC--and yet they couldn't find crash hardened data recorders. The
data and voice recorders are designed to survive both the crash and
resulting fire and almost always do. Why not this time?

Now the FBI tells us they will not be releasing the lone cockpit voice
recorder that survived Flight 93 because "it would be too traumatic for
the surviving families." What could be more traumatic that what they
already know? This is just another blatant excuse to withhold even more
information about the tragedies. There has to be a good reason why the
FBI refuses to release this voice recorder, and I think it has to do
with the fact that it may not have been a hijacking at all that took
down this aircraft.

It is becoming evident that Flight 93 was shot down by an unmarked white
jet that was seen intercepting Flight 93 and following it down as it
crashed. The jet was witnessed in detail by several people on the
ground. One military witness claims he heard a missile being fired. In
addition, the main body of the engine of Flight 93 was found miles from
the main wreckage site, with damage comparable to that which a heat
seeking missile would do to an airliner. There were also personal
papers, and articles of clothing from the plane found miles from the
crash. The government is now saying these were carried up into the air
by the crash fireball--but no such occurrence has happened in other
crashes. The existing body of evidence is found at on a website at
http://www.flight93crash.com .

The website doesn't draw any conclusions except that
Flight 93 didn't go down as the public has been told and that the
government knows why and isn't telling.
Instant Emails to Israel Warned of 911 Attack Just Hours Prior
= = = = = = = =
Ha'aretz Daily - Israel

Odigo Says Workers Were Warned Of 911 Attack 2 Hours Before
By Yuval Dror

Odigo, the instant messaging service, says that two of its workers
received messages two hours before the Twin Towers attack on September
11 predicting the attack would happen, and the company has been
cooperating with Israeli and American law enforcement, including the
FBI, in trying to find the original sender of the message predicting the attack.

Micha Macover, CEO of the company, said the two workers received the
messages and immediately after the terror attack informed the company's
management, which immediately contacted the Israeli security services,
which brought in the FBI.

"I have no idea why the message was sent to these two workers, who don't
know the sender. It may just have been someone who was joking and turned
out they accidentally got it right. And I don't know if our information
was useful in any of the arrests the FBI has made," said Macover. Odigo
is a U.S.-based company whose headquarters are in New York, with offices
in Herzliya.

As an instant messaging service, Odigo users are not limited to sending
messages only to people on their "buddy" list, as is the case with ICQ,
the other well-known Israeli instant messaging application.

Odigo usually zealously protects the privacy of its registered users,
said Macover, but in this case the company took the initiative to
provide the law enforcement services with the originating Internet
Presence address of the message, so the FBI could track down the
Internet Service Provider, and the actual sender of the original message.

Proof Of Controlled Demolition At The WTC
By Jerry Russell, Ph.D.

    Main Page - Tuesday, 05/13/03

    Message Board by American Patriot Friends Network [APFN]


    messageboard.gif (4314 bytes)