M. Abernathy
Schlund Affidavit -- Part 22
Mon May 5 14:43:08 2003
216.19.126.132

She worked for the DEA and was paid to commit perjury before the DEA and/or the
court, and I had told the FBI who she was from the first in 1992. If we could get my DEA
records we could see how the DEA conducted the framing of me and be able to
better show the court how all of these covert operations were conducted to cover
up the information I have. If the DEA had any real evidence against me and
really wanted to arrest me they would have taken this information before a grand
jury and obtained a warrant and prosecuted me. This will never happen because
the DEA fully knows that this would force the FBI to release my files showing
how the DEA framed me. I called the FBI and asked them if I should get the DEA
to arrest me. The FBI's reply to me was, "You don't really believe that you
could get the DEA to arrest you, do you?" My reply back was, "No, I guess there
is no way I could get the DEA to arrest me, is there?" The DEA has always let
me know if I would become a drug dealer to discredit my information that they in
return would not torture me anymore. I do not want to be a drug dealer and it
is outrageous for the court to allow the DEA to force me to become one to get
relief from torture. I will fight this as long as it takes.

The court must understand that there is no difference if the person was tortured
with the DEA facing them and forced them to sign a confession, or if the DEA
tortured them remotely until they agreed to give a false statement in exchange
for relief from the torture. The investigation by the DEA ended the first
minute it used the devices to torture me with, which was within one week after
their injection. No investigation can be conducted using torture. These acts
are why the Torture Protection Act exists.

The court should also be aware of the fact that I demanded that the DEA not
enter my home or other places where they could steal or plant evidence without
the FBI escorting them and I demanded this the entire time and the DEA refused
so they could steal and plant evidence. Furthermore, the only thing we are
asking for at this time is to allow the trial to go forward so we can obtain
justice and prove this in court. We are also asking for relief from the torture
by my torturers. This would return my human rights and allow me to fight these
corrupt agents and the corrupt judges that have authorized them to use torture
through the court system. By allowing discovery, we will be able to build the
documentation required to prove everything in trial. To not allow this to go
forward would be treason against the American People and would promote the use
of torture against the American People under cover of law.

The court must understand that in the Don Bolles Papers no one would not agree
to do this under torture. Not one person in all of the people they framed and
there were many. In the Don Bolles Papers the CIA and DEA had concluded that no
one could withstand this kind of torture and everyone would break and do what
they wanted them to do without exception. They had concluded that this form of
torture was far better than any form of physical torture known and much more
painful than any physical torture that a person could live through.

I also do not want the court to forget that it makes no difference if I'm a drug
dealer or not. Torture is still illegal and the damages remain the same. The
court must understand that it would be impossible for me to be a drug dealer
with implants in my neck. It would also be impossible for the DEA not to catch
me if I was a drug dealer with implants in my neck. The DEA has no intent on
arresting me; their only intent is to torture me and cause me as much pain and
suffering as possible while still keeping me alive to further torture me.

The only involvement in drugs I had during this entire time was when the DEA
would send its girls into the bar to conduct their covert operations against
me. Or when the DEA would have the Dirty Dozen supply people around me with
drugs. I never sold any drug during any of these times to anyone. One of the
girls that the DEA was using through the Dirty Dozen to set me up with, came in
after these operations were done and apologized to me, and told me they had her
strung out on crack at the time. The FBI and all of the others were there when
this happened and I'm sure it's on film.

I tape recorded many of the conversations with the DEA when I was calling them
and many other conversations. I have a large number of these conversations
including John Albano from the DEA in Washington, D.C. admitting the implants
are in my neck. I also have many more conversations proving that the DEA fully
knew they were torturing me. It would most likely take thousands of pages to
transcribe all of the tapes for the court.

Adam at the Phoenix office of the FBI also has called my house and said the
implants are CIA implants. I just got up from typing and went out back to get some
relief from the mode they were using against me. Today's date is December 14, 1999
and the time is about 11:30 PM. When I got up I could barely walk due to the torture
mode the DEA was using on me. When I went out into my back yard the torture mode
was immediately changed. The sound was increased in my left ear where they are using
sounds of a pulsed computer program to torture me. This form of torture bothers
me greatly but it not painful in the current mode. There are other modes that
are painful. They were also using a different mode on me that cripples me and is
painful. This mode was immediately removed when I opened the back door.

I do not understand why this is done but they always remove this mode when I open
the door and go outside. Within a few minutes I'm able to walk again but I'm still
limping some. When this mode is turned up, I'm totally crippled. The DEA is now
threatening me for typing this part and is bringing up pain on both sides of my
head. The DEA was just making me scream some for typing this part. The computer
program of sounds has also changed during...right now...now it's back to where
it was. During this period the right implant was being used to monitor me. The
monitoring mode is not painful but the filter they use to filter out the torture
mode of sounds from the left implant is painful.

Today's date is December 16, 1999 and the time is about 4:45 PM. I have just
returned home from work. The torture and control of me today by the DEA was much
different than ever before. I slept in my back yard last night because they
torture me heavy during my sleep if I try to sleep in the house. In other
words, I have been forced to sleep outside in the cold by using torture against
me to drive me out of my house. The modes that were used against me last night
and today were far different than ever before but they were still painful,
disorienting and disrupting. The modes that they used against me today also
left me somewhat disabled and somewhat crippled. These acts are not the acts of
an investigation; they are the criminal acts of torture and control. An
investigation is when you collect information on someone. Control and torture
is when you torture and hurt someone and control their actions. There is a
difference between the two.

When I got home and got my mail there was a letter from the court. This letter
was the court's response to our motion to reconsider. Our motion was denied, as
I was sure it would be. In the court denial of our motion they stated some of
the facts that the court used to refuse me my right to be free from torture.
I'm not a lawyer so I will respond to the court in my words the way I see what
has happened and is happening. My response may not be the legal way but it is
truthful and it does describe how the court is denying my human rights using the
cover of law.

First, the court used Fed. R. Civ. P. 59 (e) or Fed. R. Civ. P. 60 (b). I do not
see what this has to do with the issue of torture and the court's refusal to
honor their oath of office and demand that my Constitutional rights be upheld
and demand that the DEA stop the use of torture against American citizens.

The court wants newly discovered evidence. We would be very happy to supply
the court with such evidence if the court would allow us to obtain our evidence
without using their powers to stop us from obtaining our evidence. I have
repeatedly had CAT Scans done to obtain the evidence for this court. To stop me
from obtaining this evidence, the court has authorized the DEA to alter my
evidence so the DEA under the authority of the court can continue to torture me
under the cover of law. The court thinks it has the right to alter physical
evidence in a federal trial to stop citizens of the United States from obtaining
justice and the return of their human rights. These acts by the court are
obstruction of justice and witness tampering against a federal witness who was
supplying the FBI with information against corrupt judges in this court (this
court being the District of Arizona.) To me, these acts are the acts of
organized crime and racketeering. When I would go to get my CAT Scans done, the
operator would inform me that he has seen these devices before. Other times,
the operator let me know that the devices did show up good on the CAT Scans.

I was never allowed to get my copies of these CAT Scans until after the DEA
altered these CAT Scans which were my physical evidence for this court. If this
court really wants evidence we would be very happy to supply this court with the
evidence if this court would stop altering, stealing, fabricating, planting and
tampering with the evidence. (this court being the District Court of Arizona)
Let me further inform the court of the facts. I called John Albano at the DEA
in Washington, D.C. and got his permission to get the CAT Scan first and have
the devices removed. The DEA then under the protection of this court altered my
CAT Scan and then had me tortured further. The next time I went to obtain a CAT
Scan was after the US Attorney replied to our lawsuit and said that there is not
any implants. Don't misunderstand me, I'm not accusing him of corruption; I
believe he did this so we could obtain the CAT Scans. I then went to get a CAT
Scan for no other reason than to prove in court that there was implants. Again
the DEA knowingly, willfully and deliberately altered physical evidence to
obstruct justice and stop these court proceedings. The court must also
understand that I am a witness against the DEA for murder, drug running, fixing
of elections, framing innocent people and many more crimes including the use of
torture.

Next, the court is manifestly unjust. Nothing can be more unjust then to allow
a judge to hear a case that involves corruption on his part. I had supplied
Judge Broomfield's name to the FBI in writing in 1992 in a letter that I had
secretly delivered to the FBI. This letter gave Judge Broomfield's name,
address and phone number. Judge Broomfield had just tried to set me up to find
out how much information I really had. I had been doing Judge Broomfield's
electrical work for many years prior to this. I had also read Judge
Broomfield's file in the Don Bolles Papers, which included the plans to make him
a federal judge. The court must understand that I was doing a lot of the CIA's
covert illegal operations, jobs and cover projects.

Next, the court said in its reply that this is not the place to make new
arguments. Our arguments are not new; they are our response to the court for
illegally dismissing our fair and just lawsuit against the DEA. We did not want
to raise any new arguments; we were responding to the court's injustice.
Next, the court says we should not have the court rethink what it has already
thought. This is not what happened. What happened is I gave the FBI information
on corrupt judges and then these judges authorized my torture under the cover of
law and also dismissed my correct lawsuit against those they had authorized to
torture me under the color of authority. The court said the technology does not
exist, so we supplied the court with the technology that proved it is possible
for the technology to exist. We would have supplied the court with the CAT
Scans if the court had not authorized the DEA to alter the CAT Scans. This is
an issue for discovery.

Next, let's go to the court using Celotex and rule 56. If the court really
intended to allow us to submit real evidence they would not have authorized the
altering of our evidence so we could not submit it. The court cannot expect us
to be able to defend ourselves while the court is authorizing the use of torture
against us to stop us and is also having our evidence altered to fix the court
proceeding in their favor. All of these covert operations are being done under
the cover of an investigation. Torture is not part of any real investigation.
All investigations end when the person being investigated is being tortured by
those conducting the investigation.

Next, the court said that we should not have submitted the evidence we submitted
for reconsideration and that this evidence should have been submitted before.
We demanded a jury trial; we never authorized the court to judge us. The court
asked for this evidence by saying the technology does not exist. We then proved
that such technology does exist. These issues are issues for the jury, not for
the court to pre-judge us.

Next, the court says that we failed to prove that mind control technology
existed. I do not believe that the court does not understand that torture is a
form of mind control. The United States government has long recognized this
fact. In Korea, they called this Brainwashing. When you force someone to do
things against their will using torture to direct them in the direction you wish
them to go, this is a form of mind control. No one will do or think the way
they wish to go or think under torture. The people using torture can always
force the target to do their bidding-- given enough time. When the DEA tortures
me until I'm temporarily insane this is a form of mind control. I have no
control over what I say or do during these types of torture. At times I do not
even know where I am or who I am during these torture sessions. This cannot be
called any other thing other than torture and mind control. In other words,
torture is a form of mind control and has been used for this reason since the
dawn of mankind.

The issues before this court is not if the technology exists. Any reasonable
person knows the technology exists to remotely torture someone. When my right
to a jury trial is given to me I will prove beyond any doubt that the injection
of the devices resulted in the torture of me. I can supply hundreds of
witnesses. My medical records also prove I was tortured. The issue is the same
issue as it was in the Nuremberg trials. Our case is The Torture Protection
Act. It does not matter what they injected into my neck. What matters is if
what they injected resulted in the torture of me, which it did. The next issue
should be if the violation of my body was legal and with my consent. The court
can claim torture is an investigation and it can also claim murder is love.

By changing the name of an act does not change the result of the act, which
is torture. It does not matter if they pinched a nerve while injecting the
devices. If this resulted in the torture of me and they refused to allow me to
remove the devices and refused me any medical help by fixing my CAT scans, this
is a willful act of infliction of pain and suffering, which is torture. The DEA
claims it's conducting an investigation by holding me prisoner using torture to
stop me from going out or associating with other people. They also claim that
the depriving me of thousands of nights of sleep is an investigation.

They also believe that controlling my phone operator and altering my records is
an investigation. They also clai

• Schlund Affidavit -- Part 23 — Martin F. Abernathy, Mon May 5 14:44
• Schlund Affidavit -- Part 24 — M. Abernathy, Mon May 5 14:46
• Schlund Affidavit -- Part 25 — Martin F. Abernathy, Mon May 5 14:47
• Schlund Affidavit -- Part 26 — M. Abernathy, Mon May 5 14:48
• Schlund Affidavit -- Part 27 — M. Abernathy, Mon May 5 14:50
• Schlund Affidavit -- Part 28 — Martin F. Abernathy, Mon May 5 14:51