Monetary terms......Really, who profits from mass murder
?Prepare for war with Iran, says Zionazi "Jewish" French
minister ...
http://www.palestine-encyclopedia.com/EPP/TheAuthor.htm
By Alex Spillius in Washington and Tim Butcher in Jerusalem
Last Updated: 2:31am BST 18/09/2007
http://www.iht.com/articles/ap/2007/07/10/america/NA-GEN-US-Israel-Corrie-Caterpillar.php
The world should "prepare for war" with Iran, the zionist/jewish-French
foreign minister has said, significantly escalating tensions
over the country's nuclear programme.
Avowed Zionist Terrorist Supporter , Bernard Kouchner said that
while "we must negotiate right to the end" with Iran, if Teheran
possessed an atomic weapon it would represent "a real danger for
the whole worldwide zionist Agenda...Duh!
http://www.debka.com/headline.php?hid=4591
Bernard Kouchner: prepare for the worst
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&ie=ISO-8859-1&q=Waco%2Capfn&btnG=Search
The world should "prepare for the worst... which is war", he
said with a wolfowitz smirk that only lizards can make.
meanwhile back at the ranchozionazified...Amerika.... Abrams
also said Israel purchased the bulldozers with U.S. aid, further
complicating the issue. - What are the freaking odds of that ?
"If your honors did look at the Zionazified U.S. as paying for
the bulldozer, the U.S. would be an aider and abettor as well,"
he said. "There is no conclusion that can be reached other than,
it presents a political question." Actually It Raises the
fundamental issue...Whose "God" is being served....Talmudic
Terrorists...Or The King of Kings ?
Judge Michael Hawkins asked Zionazi Criminal Justice Department
lawyer Robert Loeb to consider the hypothetical case of a U.S.
oven manufacturer during World War II: If the company continued
selling ovens to Germany, knowing they were being used to kill
Jews, would there be legal grounds to go after the company? ? ?
Yes, Loeb replied — treason, for starters.
ButZionazi terrorist "Israel" is a - Occupied by Zionist
Talmudic Terrorists/U.S. ally, and "a U.S. court would have to
opine on what really happened in Gaza and the West Bank," Loeb
said. "This is a prime example of where the court should decline
to extend its common-law jurisdiction. ... The financing and the
sale of this equipment have been approved by the United States.
(The plaintiffs) want to have a court second-guess the judgment
of the government."..."We The People in order to form a more
perfect union do Establish Justice"......
Israel’s man at the Quai d’Orsay and renowned warmonger, Bernard
Kouchner, is settling comfortably into his new role — he has
just threatened war. However, this time he appears to have
gotten ahead of himself. Even the generally staid IAEA has been
impelled to rebuke his crude warmongering (recall that in the
past Kouchner has been wise enough to cloak his martial
ambitions in humanitarian garb), along with the generally
restrained Austrians.
It is not clear how the rest of France feels about Iran’s
alleged nuclear ambitions, but the lobby has for some time been
annoyed with IAEA’s refusal to play ball (even though IAEA
inspectors have been turning over data from their tours of Irani
nuclear facilities to Israeli and US intelligence ever since
Iran began the voluntary cooperation. I emphasize the
‘voluntary’ because Iran is not required through its NPT
obligations to submit to these inspections). It has been
ratcheting up its rhetoric to pressure the agency into taking a
more hardline position. The lobby is also concerned with the
recent focus on its role in urging US on towards the Iraq war; a
new war will relieve the pressure, albeit temporarily, as the
nation will predictably respond with characteristic jingoism,
lining up behind ‘our boys’Such must have been the presidential
thinking on September 10th when Carter sat down with Democracy
Now's Amy Goodman to continue his anti-Israel rants unfettered
by an impartial journalist who might challenge his disgraceful
views. Here are some of the lowlights (h/t Tim Graham):
Americans don't want to know and many Israelis don't want to
know what is going on inside Palestine. It's a terrible human
rights persecution that far transcends what any outsider would
imagine. And there are powerful political forces in America that
prevent any objective analysis of the problem in the Holy Land.
I think it's accurate to say that not a single member of
Congress with whom I'm familiar would possibly speak out and
call for Israel to withdraw to their legal boundaries or to
publicize the plight of the Palestinians or even to call
publicly and repeatedly for good faith peace talks. There hasn't
been a day of peace talks now in more than seven years. So this
is a taboo subject. And I would say that if any member of
Congress did speak out, as I've just described, they would
probably not be back in the Congress the next term.
http://www.israelect.com/reference/WillieMartin/ANSWER.htm