Mon Jun 25, 2007 13:28

RADIO YOUR WAY.. 6/28/07


"The Charles Coyette Show" KFNX 1100 AM PHX AZ
AUDIO: 6 TO 6 30 AM

"The Charles Coyette Show" KFNX 1100 AM PHX AZ

"The Charles Coyette Show" KFNX 1100 AM PHX AZ

"The Charles Coyette Show" KFNX 1100 AM PHX AZ

"The Charles Coyette Show" KFNX 1100 AM PHX AZ



Quickie Video I made & put up last month....
Ron Paul (We want this country back) in 2008


If every person has the right to defend -- even by force -- his person, his liberty, and his property, then it follows that a group of men have the right to organize and support a common force to protect these rights constantly. Thus the principle of collective right -- its reason for existing, its lawfulness -- is based on individual right. And the common force that protects this collective right cannot logically have any other purpose or any other mission than that for which it acts as a substitute. Thus, since an individual cannot lawfully use force against the person, liberty, or property of another individual, then the common force -- for the same reason -- cannot lawfully be used to destroy the person, liberty, or property of individuals or groups.

Such a perversion of force would be, in both cases, contrary to our premise. Force has been given to us to defend our own individual rights. Who will dare to say that force has been given to us to destroy the equal rights of our brothers? Since no individual acting separately can lawfully use force to destroy the rights of others, does it not logically follow that the same principle also applies to the common force that is nothing more than the organized combination of the individual forces?

If this is true, then nothing can be more evident than this: The law is the organization of the natural right of lawful defense. It is the substitution of a common force for individual forces. And this common force is to do only what the individual forces have a natural and lawful right to do: to protect persons, liberties, and properties; to maintain the right of each, and to cause justice to reign over us all.

A Just and Enduring Government

CAP Report Finds A “Structural Imbalance Of Political Talk Radio”

Senators Clinton and Boxer, “Muzzle Talk Radio”

Congress has long sought ways to muzzle a free media and not directly violate the first amendment of the constitution. The first attempt came shortly after the FCC [Federal Communications Commission] was authorized in the 1930s. The fear of pending war gave President Roosevelt authority to manipulate the FCC into doing his bidding he used it to silence his critics in the new media at the time radio. Congress has continually made an effort to control the output of the radio industry.

Radio and later Television Stations have been required to give equal time to all political candidates this has been in effect for years. Later congress attempted to expand that authority to what they called the fairness doctrine by passing legislation making it a law both sides would be presented in all radio and television commentary. First President Ragan then Bush One vetoed the legislation as an infringement of free speech, a violation of the first amendment.

Liberal radio’s made numerous attempts to compete with conservative talk radio with few successes. Organizing liberals into a listening group is like herding cats, each cat has its own opinion and since liberals are better talkers than listeners the market for liberal Radio isn’t there. Now congress wants to require conservative talk radio to spread their liberal message. Senators Clinton Boxer and McCain want to bring the unconstitutional “Fairness Doctrine” back. It may have withstood the Burger Court, if such legislation becomes law I doubt it will hold up in the Richardson Court.

The public is passing off many of the things congress is doing as business as usual. That’s a mistake it doesn’t take long before the governments in control of all businesses. Hillary Clinton’s been heard to say “Government can do a better job than the private sector” if that’s the case why doesn’t government generate the nations wealth and pay taxes to the pirate sector?

I’ve been asked several times in the past few months if I worry there’ll be a Democratic sweep of the government. I don’t worry about it I believe it’s entirely probable. Republican congressmen and the president have abandoned the conservative cause they were elected to maintain and build on. The Republicans problem has been, they didn’t know how to lead, they only knew how to follow. Newt Gingrich guided Bill Clinton’s economic ship through six years of troubling waters, what did his Republican friends reward him with, replacement with the hammer, Tom DeLay. Newt Gingrich’s Contract with America has run out of steam. It will be up to the next president to maintain the nation’s new found prosperity. Worrying what Rush Limbaugh and Laura Ingham will say isn’t going to do much for the affairs of state or our dealings around the world. I have no doubt Rush Limbaugh would love to present a liberal view in his comments and I have no doubt the liberals would be up in arms if he did.

I doubt Liberals want their truth told, I’m not sure it could withstand the light of day. The majority of politic is about intimidation, congress taking on the masters of political punditry doesn’t seem like something any sane politician would want to try.

Main Page - Monday, 06/25/07

Message Board by American Patriot Friends Network [APFN]


messageboard.gif (4314 bytes)