Who will bite first, the U.S. or Iran?
Fri Apr 6, 2007 10:06

Who will bite first, the U.S. or Iran?

Who will bite first, the U.S. or Iran?

Who will bite first, the U.S. or Iran?

15:39 | 05/ 04/ 2007

Who will bite first, the U.S. or Iran?

Who will bite first, the U.S. or Iran?

15:39 | 05/ 04/ 2007

MOSCOW. (RIA Novosti political commentator Pyotr Goncharov) - The world is waiting for April 6, when the United States supposedly plans to launch Operation Bite against Iran.

Washington has accumulated the required forces in the region: two task groups in the Persian Gulf, including the aircraft carriers USS Dwight Eisenhower and USS John Stennis, four nuclear submarines, two dozen cruisers, and more than 400 sea- and ground-based aircraft, including Stealth planes that will allegedly carry out the greater part of the task.

The approved targets are the Natanz uranium enrichment facility, the Isfahan nuclear research center, the Araq heavy-water plant, the Bushehr nuclear power plant, air force and naval bases, air defense centers, and command and control headquarters.

The plans for a sneak attack are said to include a deceptive maneuver: the nuclear-powered carrier USS Nimitz left San Diego last Monday and is heading for the Gulf, where it is expected to replace the Dwight Eisenhower in mid-May. According to the logic of a lightning war, everyone will be waiting for the arrival of the third carrier, and so the attack, when it comes, will be a surprise.

On the other hand, the operation may not begin on April 6, despite the "telling signs" detected mainly by Russian military experts and the General Staff. One of the reasons is that there is no time left for the U.S. to speak about the "inevitability" of confrontation and warn Iran of the impending doom. I am referring to the requisite "demoralization stage," which is not part of the rules accepted in the civilized world. The Pentagon usually carries out pre-war demoralization preparations because they can reduce potential casualties.

So, will there be a war, and if so, when will it begin?

Tehran can avoid the war if it revises its attitude to its nuclear program and its policy in the region, where it has been trying to position itself as the center of Islamic civilization. However, this will happen only if President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and his team lose power, which is improbable.

Some pin their hopes on Ali Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani, nicknamed the Pistachio King because he was born into a wealthy pistachio growing family, who keeps his millions abroad and who was written off after being defeated by Ahmadinejad. However, he topped the poll in last December's elections to the Expediency Council.

The Council has the authority to mediate disputes between parliament and the Council of Guardians, and serves as an advisory body to the Supreme Leader, making it one of the most powerful governing bodies in the country.

Experts believe that Rafsanjani may propose discussing the expediency of changing Iran's nuclear and foreign policies.

According to another scenario, after the UN Security Council approves tougher sanctions on Iran, the U.S. will opt for a unilateral blockade of the country. If this happens, Tehran might take steps that would create a pretext for a U.S. military operation.

So far, it is Iran that is doing everything to prod the United States towards a war. I am referring not only to its nuclear program and nuclear ambitions as a whole, but also to its anti-Semitic policy and the anti-Israel speeches of its leaders. In particular, Ahmadinejad has spoken of the need for Israel to be "wiped off the map." Tehran also has a completely negative approach to the Palestinian-Israeli peace process and is providing financial and political assistance to extremist Islamic groups in the Middle East.

That policy is spearheaded mainly against the U.S. and its interests in the region. It would not be wise for Washington to overlook Tehran's potential in the region and its claim to the role of a regional superpower. It might as well leave the region, which I don't think it will ever do.

On the other hand, Tehran may be contemplating a pre-emptive "bite," which would only mean that the numerous deliberations about the "April 6 sneak attack" have reached their goal.

The opinions expressed in this article are the author's and do not necessarily represent those of RIA Novosti.


Beware the False Flags are Flying! Black Operations planned long in advance!

Chertoff: Next 9/11 could be launched by Europeans
Posted Apr 5, 2007 04:02 PM PST

"Everybody hates us, so we won't be safe until we conquer them all!"

The Media Calls him Al Qaeda, but his Jewish Father calls him Adam Pearlman
What the CNN article never mentions is that Adam Gadhn, or “Azzam the American,” as the media likes to refer to him, is in reality a Jew from California named Adam Pearlman. I’m not kidding reader, I’m as serious as a heart attack, Azzam the American is a Jew. CNN isn’t the only negligent news agency, not a single one of the television networks have mentioned Gadahn’s/Pearlman’s pedigree, not one. The only news source I am aware of that has mentioned the fact that “Azzam the American” is Jewish, was the LA Times and the Washington Post, and then only in the most cryptic manner.

(See Also- Is Michael Chertoff of The Devil Himself?

Michael Chertoff Lookalike of ` Stalin Commie Clones


Al-Sahab Expected To Release New Bin Ladin Video


Al-Sahab Expected To Release New Bin Ladin Video

Terrorism: Al-Sahab Reportedly To Release New Bin Ladin Video Message

On 4 April, a jihadist website carried the following posting:

"After a long absence by the shaykh of mujahidin, whom we have missed as well as his speeches, some news is being leaked indicating that Shaykh Usama Bin Ladin, God protect and preserve him and make him a thorn in the throat of the enemies, will make an appearance. The news indicates that Al-Sahab Media Establishment, which specializes in publishing Al-Qa'ida leaders' speeches, has recently finished producing a video featuring Bin Ladin's speech to the entire Islamic nation. "

Furthermore, the poster of this note maintains that the speech includes several messages to the "mujahidin" in Iraq, the Palestinian People on " the capitulation choice which HAMAS gave in to," the Riyadh Arab summit, the "fears" of America and its allies of the establishment of the Islamic Caliphate state in Iraq, and the "good tidings of victory in Iraq and Afghanistan."


See Also :
Aka Tim Osman or Ossman
CIA Agent Operative & more!

PsyOps&BlackOps &False Flags Flying
Agent Provocateurs



The Mossad spies

Fake Al Qaeda
The Phony (Mossad)
Al Qaeda Cell in Palestine


Israel Warns of Al Qaeda Attack on Lebanon Peacekeepers
Meaning: Israel is planning false-flag attack to justify going back into Lebanon.,2933,235560,00.html

" AL QAEDA" Planning For Nuclear Attack "

Are False Flag Attacks About To Be Launched On US Carriers In The Gulf?


(When is an MUSLIM Cleric Really A Jew Pretending
To Be A Muslim??? )

These and the following links at:


False Flags, Black Ops. Moles,Patsies, Agent Provocateurs,
see above link for tons more links!

Burden of Dreams
Cut-outs, moles, patsies and provocateurs

The "War on Terror" is a ruse by central bankers to control every aspect of your life.

Main Page - Saturday, 04/07/07

Message Board by American Patriot Friends Network [APFN]


messageboard.gif (4314 bytes)