Anonymous
How the 9/11 investigation should really be conducted
Sat Feb 14 10:32:03 2004
67.1.158.78

Detective Story
How the 9/11 investigation should really be conducted
By John Kaminski
skylax@comcast.net
2-14-4


If we had a real Attorney General in the United States, instead
of a glossolalia-gagged demagogue who takes payoffs from industrialists
to advance his religious pathologies, we would have solved the tragic
riddle of 9/11 by now.

If we had a real Attorney General who championed the rights of
all Americans instead of merely protecting the rich patricians he so
obnoxiously serves, we would undoubtedly have hundreds of people -
including the top leaders of our country - already indicted and awaiting
trials for their roles in the treasonous tragedy of 9/11.

But we don't have such an Attorney General. And we don't have
real law enforcement in this country, despite all this cynical blather
about Homeland Security. And no one has been apprehended and charged in
the most serious crime in American history.

The investigation has been bungled from the start. And the
continuing coverup begins with President George W. Bush, who from day
one has covered up the true facts of that dark day, and continues to do
so to this very moment.

The official story of 9/11 posits that 19 Arab terrorists
hijacked four planes and crashed three of them into well-known American
landmarks, costing more than three thousand Americans their lives. Yet
no conclusive evidence has ever connected these alleged Arab terrorists
to the actual crime. Only a campaign of media hysteria centered around
vague and unproved aspersions from Washington has swayed the American
people like some drunken lynch mob into accepting government's story,
which amounts to a massive hate crime against Muslims.

A paltry and essentially powerful government-appointed panel is
right now frittering away more time dealing with nonessential aspects of
the investigation. Public confidence in their deliberations is sinking
day by day as one public official after another - including the
President - insists they will testify before the panel but only in
private, lest the public get wind of the shallow and self-serving lies
they are sure to tell.

But if we had a real Attorney General who truly cared about
justice for all those dead victims, and we lived in an actual democracy
that was genuinely of, by, and for the people, this is what he'd do.

First, instead of locking up every headscarfed Muslim between
Boston and West Covina, he would inquire discreetly about every single
financial transaction that was made in the two weeks before 9/11, and
quickly determine exactly who made the most significant profits. In a
very short time he would discover the names of the investors who made
millions from those "put" options purchased on United and American
Airlines, and when he had those names, well, that's when the real fun
would begin.

Those people would be, as they say in the cop business, brought
in for questioning. And I mean questioning. There should be no more
important law enforcement goal in the country right now than to identify
those people who made that money because of their prior knowledge that
9/11 would happen.

And since these folks are probably such wusses, it wouldn't take
much pressure - no more than, say, a dozen solid punches in the mouth -
to get them to spill the beans on where they got their information.

And once that information, and those names, were in the
possession of a real Attorney General, well, then the FBI boys and
girls - instead of being ordered to sit on their hands as they so often
are by high government muckymucks who are deftly and crookedly stealing
from the American people on a regular basis ... then the FBI and all
those other acronymmed agents could go out and make some real arrests.

Unfortunately, this could only happen in a legitimate democracy.
And you can't possibly imagine it happening in this disgustingly corrupt
and prejudiced mess we have called the United States of America, where
the rich can commit any crime they want and get away with because they
can pay off the judges and lawyers, while the poor don't even really
have to commit a crime to get put in jail.

Anyway, in a legitimate democracy - one that actually worked -
once the agents made the real arrests that would produce the perps who
provided the inside information to investors that 9/11 was coming down
and there was money to be made, then we could have some very interesting
interrogations, which in a real democracy would definitely be televised.
Talk about a ratings boost!

These wheeler dealers would then have to tell the real Attorney
General where they got their information. And whom do you think they
would finger, hmm?

This would surely lead to a new phase of the investigation.

A real Attorney General would take that information and then
deploy a task force to study what influential people had made statements
incriminating themselves prior to the perpetration of the crime. You
remember - the greatest crime in American history.

In a real democracy without favoritism for the rich or
privileges for the powerful, that task force would quickly zero in on a
couple of well-connected, powerful politicos who actually had the
chutzpah to publish their incriminating statements in book form, making
it oh so easy for the real Attorney General's crack task force to bring
these individuals in for questioning, and use the same technique that
they used on the stock traders to elicit the stories of how these
powerful politicos came to utter these statements, these indications
used by stock traders to make millions, in the first place.

First in line on the hot seat would be Zbigniew Brzezinski,
President Carter's former national security adviser, who wrote in a book
called "The Grand Chessboard" that "America is too democratic at home to
be autocratic abroad. This limits the use of America's power, especially
its capacity for military intimidation." Brzezinski then concluded that
in order to achieve this goal of increased military intimidation, what
was needed was "a sudden threat or challenge to the public's sense of
domestic well-being ..."

Hmm, that sounds an awful lot like 9/11.

Since Brzezinski is a member of two high-powered elitist groups,
the Council on Foreign Relations and the Trilateral Commission, a real
Attorney General would have some interesting choices among the names
Brzezinski might cough up as his sources on how that information got to
those investors who were savvy enough to make those trades because they
knew 9/11 was coming down.

The other bunch of fools who put their prediction in writing
and, in the mind of a real Attorney General, automatically qualify as
suspects in the conspiracy to pull off the greatest crime in American
history were all those so-called neocons who put their names in a report
produced by a group called Project for a New American Century, known as
PNAC, who included such well-known reptilians as Donald Rumsfeld, Dick
Cheney, Jeb Bush, Paul Wolfowitz and others of their soulless ilk.

Their PNAC report actually came out and said America's evolution
into an unbridled military terror machine would need "some catastrophic
and catalyzing event - like a new Pearl Harbor."

Now that really sounds like 9/11, doesn't it?

Just imagine what a real Attorney General, along with his merry
band of interrogators who worked in a real democracy and believed in
justice for all and not just the super rich ... could do with a line
like that.

I'd guess that in short order they'd have the real perpetrators
of the greatest crime in American history squarely in their sites, and
be frying up the indictments as we speak. Indictments, hundreds of them,
for treason, conspiracy to commit mass murder, and obstruction of
justice.

Roll the phrase over on your tongue - treason, mass murder, and
obstruction of justice. Think of it as the new meme that could save
America.

But all of this could only happen with a real Attorney General
who worked for all the people and not just the rich. Also, it's
important to to remember this could only happen in a legitimate
democracy.

So it's doubtful it could happen anytime soon in the United
States of America.




John Kaminski is the author of "America's Autopsy Report," a
collection of his Internet essays published by Dandelion Books and
featured on hundreds of websites around the world. For more information
on how to get this book or to financially support his work, go to
http://www.johnkaminski.com /. Or, to read some more of his recent
essays, go to http://www.rudemacedon.ca/kaminski/kam-index.html



--
Thank you, Be seeing you.
In the Village.
#6