Meet The IRS, America's Enemy From Within...


Document # 100.0.3     # 06 of 37...............-Meet The IRS, America's
Enemy From Within...

             >>>>Disclaimer: This document may be used as you will except:
If you change anything in the text, remove my name and other Ident. You may
use it without my identification also if you wish...I only ask that people
read it and think...think...think. Sources/Ref's if not in the text will be
found on the last page of Doc and 000.0.6. CLMsr.<<<<
 In all of this discussion about income tax, we should be ever mindful of
the fact that CONGRESS is the key.
CONGRESS votes to spend the money.  Congress gives the IRS its power.
Congress is elected by the people.  The IRS is A DECOY.
 The IRS is not who you think they are. IRS agents are neither trained nor
paid by the United States Government.
 Pursuant to Treasury Delegation Order No. 92, the IRS is trained under the
direction of the Division of Human Resources United Nations (UN) and the
Commissioner (International), by the office of Personnel Management.
 In the 1979 edition of 22 USCA 278, "The United Nations," you will find
Executive Order 10422. The Office of Personnel Management is under the
direction of the Secretary of the United Nations.
 Pursuant to Treasury Delegation Order No. 91, the IRS entered into a
"Service Agreement" with the US Treasury Department (See Public Law 94-564,
Legislative History, pg. 5967, Reorganization (BANKRUPTCY!!!) Plan No. 26)
and the Agency for International Development. This agency is an
international paramilitary operation and according to the Department of the
Army Field manual (1969) 41-10, pgs 1-4, Sec. 1-7 (b) & 1-6, Sec.1-10 (7)
(c) (1), and 22 USCA 284, includes such activities as, "Assumption of full
or partial executive, legislative, and judicial authority over a country or
 The IRS is also an agency/member of a 169 nation pact called the
International Criminal Police Organization, or INTERPOL, found at 22 USCA
263a. The memorandum of Understanding, (MOU), between the Secretary of
Treasury, AKA the corporate governor of "The Fund" and "The Bank"
(International Monetary Fund, and the International Bank for Reconstruction
and Development), indicated that the Attorney General and its associates are
soliciting and collecting information for foreign principals; the
international organizations, corporations, and associations, exemplified by
22 USCA 286f .
 According to the 1994 US Government Manual, at page 390, the Attorney
General is the permanent representative to INTERPOL, and the Secretary of
Treasury is the alternate member. Under Article 30 of the INTERPOL
constitution, these individuals must expatriate their citizenship. They
serve no allegiance to the United States of America. The IRS is paid by "The
Fund" and "The Bank."
 Thus it appears from the documentary evidence that the Internal Revenue
Service agents are "Agents of a Foreign Principle" within the meaning and
intent of the "Foreign Agents Registration Act of 1938" for private, not
public, gain.
 The IRS is directed and controlled by the corporate Governor of "The Fund"
and "The Bank." The Federal Reserve Bank and the IRS collection agency are
both privately owned and operated under private statutes. The IRS operates
under public policy, not Constitutional Law, and in the interest of our
nations foreign creditors.
 The Constitution only permits Congress to lay and collect taxes. It does
not authorize Congress to delegate the tax collection power to a private
corporation, which collects our taxes for a private bank, the Federal
Reserve, who then deposits it into the Treasury of the IMF.
 The IRS is not allowed to state that they collect taxes for the United
States Treasury. They only refer to "The Treasury."  Your tax dollars, all
of them, go out of the country.
The preceding information has been provided by an independent source which
must remain anonymous.
The United States is technically and legally in a bankrupt status and has
been since FDR declared it so.  See my document number

Ladies & gentlemen:
 Two items to report:  First, Judicial Watch headed by Larry Klayman, has
finally made the IRS admit it uses audits to punish United States government
critics.  Second, the Supreme Court is now hearing arguments regarding the
outrageous IRS position that food service employees are assumed to have
received at least 8% tips on the total bill of the meals they serve -- and
make them pay taxes on that amount.
 The first outrage:  Quoting an article from Newsmax, "An official with the
Internal Revenue Service has admitted that legal
opponents of former President Bill Clinton were singled out for tax audits,
according to court documents made public this week.
 "What do you expect when you sue the president?" senior IRS official Paul
Breslan told Judicial Watch, the Washington-based legal watchdog group that
had filed 50-plus legal actions against the Clinton administration and
subsequently found itself in the IRS's cross hairs.
 Breslan's quote is cited in Judicial Watch's complaint against the tax
agency, based on a host of what look to be politically-inspired audits that
make the worst abuses of the Nixon administration appear puny by comparison.
 Talk about a smoking gun!!  And now we must question why our current
president didn't replace lacky bureaucrat Charles Rossotti as IRS
Commissioner.  Have Gun Will Serve sounds like it fits.  If you've got a
menace to free speech, why not continue to use him if he's willing?
 The second outrage:  Did you know the IRS forces restaurant employers to
pay the employment FICA tax of 7.65% on that 8% tip the restaurant employees
are "assumed" to have earned, and that they do NOT credit that FICA tax to
the individual employee's social security fund?  No, they apply that money
to the general social security fund!
 And you wonder why concerned citizens began to form Militias in 1993?
 How many of you worked in a food service job at one time in your life?  I
sure did.  At 13 years-old, I was a busboy and dish washer in a local
restaurant near my home in Palo Alto, California. I always tip at least 15%
to food service workers, and most often 20%, to make up for all you
cheapskates who tip less.  But I'm in the minority.  This latest outrage is
simply ... outrageous!  No wonder a restaurant in San Francisco filed suit!
How come it didn't happen before?
 Here's the article from the San Francisco Chronicle:
 High court hears case over taxes on tips.  S.F.'s Fior d'Italia argues it's
not liable for IRS assumptions Carolyn Said, Chronicle Staff Writer
Tuesday, April 23, 2002 .
 Founded in 1886 to serve the clients of a nearby bordello, San Francisco's
Fior d'Italia restaurant is embroiled in a thoroughly modern dispute: how to
figure out the tax bite on tips for service workers. The North Beach
restaurant survived the rowdy Barbary Coast days and the 1906 earthquake and
fire, which drove it into a year long sojourn in a tent. Now it is going
head to head with the Internal Revenue Service in a pivotal lawsuit with
millions of dollars at stake.
 Yesterday, the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments in the case, which
could determine how payroll taxes are handled at the nation's 200,000
restaurants, as well as for every worker who earns tips -- from cabdrivers
to hairdressers to croupiers. A ruling is expected before the court's
session ends in July.
 A decade ago, the IRS slapped Fior d'Italia with a $23,000 bill for unpaid
Social Security taxes on its waiters' tip income, based on its "aggregate
estimate" that tips totaled 14 percent of the restaurant's gross receipts.
Fior d'Italia countered that it simply used employees' self-reported tip
income to calculate the tax bill and that if the IRS disagrees it should
audit individual workers rather than go after the restaurant.
 "We felt we followed the letter of the law," said Gianni Audieri, Fior
d'Italia co-owner and executive chef, as he greeted lunchtime diners
yesterday standing in front of vintage photographs featuring mustachioed and
bow-tied Belle Epoque customers and slightly more recent ones such as Joe
DiMaggio and Tommy Lasorda.
 "We cannot be the auditor for the IRS. I have no idea if a waiter made $10
more than he declared to the IRS. That's the IRS's problem to solve; it's
their prerogative to audit."
 What's more, he said, with the aggregate approach, the 7.65 percent Social
Security tax paid by the restaurant went into a general-purpose fund instead
of being credited to individual workers' Social Security accounts. "That
enraged us so we decided to fight," Audieri said. "Employees do not get any
benefit" from the taxes paid.
 An IRS spokesman said the agency declined to comment while the case is in
litigation. But the Bush administration, which appealed the matter to the
high court, said giving too much leeway in calculating tip income will
weaken its efforts to beef up tax collection. The Justice Department said in
court briefs that stronger enforcement has increased reporting of tip
income. Workers reported $14.3 billion in tips in 1999, up from $8.5 billion
in 1994.
 So far, the courts have backed the restaurant over the tax man. The Court
of Appeals in San Francisco last year upheld a lower court ruling that the
IRS is not authorized by Congress to use estimates in figuring out tip
income. But in similar cases elsewhere in the country, judges have sided
with the IRS.
 The restaurant on Washington Square and its waiters say the IRS method is
unfair because it overlooks the common practice of tip-sharing among
restaurant staff as well as the times that cheapskate diners stiff servers
on the tip.
 "Do I take home 15 percent (of customers' tabs) in tips? Are you crazy?"
said Matt Herman, a waiter at Fior d'Italia, darting over to a table at
lunchtime yesterday to help a diner pondering the merits of gnocchi versus
tagliolini. "Let's say I get $15 (as a tip) on a $100 bill," Herman said. "I
give $1.50 to the door (the maitre d'hotel), $1.50 to the bar and $3 to the
busboy. That leaves me with $9," or 9 percent.
 Mike Casey, president of Local 2 of the Hotel and Restaurant Employees
Union in San Francisco, said he hopes the case will resolve how tip income
is handled at tax time.
 "There are lots of occasions at restaurants or hotels where guests will not
leave tips," he said. "Yet servers and bartenders are still expected to pay
taxes on money they haven't been paid."
 The National Restaurant Association is helping Fior d'Italia pay for the
case and has filed an amicus brief supporting the restaurant.
 "The IRS is trying to impose on the employer the obligation to be the tip
police for the IRS," said Peter Kilgore, senior vice president and general
counsel for the Washington, D.C., association.
 His point exactly, Audieri said. "The IRS says it doesn't have enough
auditors," the chef said. "Whose problem is that? If I don't have enough
waiters when I have 300 customers sitting here, whose problem is that? It's
mine, not the IRS'."
 Even a Supreme Court ruling may not be the final chapter in the saga.
Whichever side loses is expected to ask Congress to change tax laws to
clarify how tips are handled.
 That's some consolation to workers like Herman who rely on tip income.
 "Corporate America sets up home offices in (offshore locations) to not have
to pay taxes," he said. "But who does the IRS go after? The little guy
scratching out a living."
 E-mail Carolyn Said at

Death to the IRS!!!!!!  Bring on the federal sales tax!  Death to the "Flat
Tax" so many people think is just great.  Why?  You still have to declare
income.  You are still subject to audit!  Tax income as it is spent, not as
it is earned.  That way you tax all income, even that of the drug lords,
prostitutes, house cleaners and gardeners.  A federal sales tax   [of .7%,
that's 7/10ths of one percent]   takes the IRS out of our lives.  Any
questions?    Carl F. Worden
    Subject: RE: It is now illegal to pay Federal Income Taxes!
 A conversation between a friend (a retired U.S. Navy submarine officer
/intelligence officer, college mate (chemistry major), and Christian
gentleman), and one of his friends.  Some of you will appreciate it.
From: "David L. Miner" <>
Dennis - Thanks for the forward.  It was great.  But the fed govt will not
see the humor in it, I promise.
As you already know, I do not file tax returns or pay income taxes. And I
have helped a couple hundred people over the years fight the IRS.  But I
have been directly involved in only one income tax court case.    Let me
tell you his story.
 Steve was an excellent father and husband, a Christian with wisdom far
beyond his years.  He was the type of man you just wanted to sit at his feet
or follow him around just to learn from him.  He was my age and we were
 But for several years he did not file his tax returns or pay any income
tax. I didn't know about this.  When I found out about it, I had moved out
of state three years earlier and I had been a non-filer for those three
years. I told him that the IRS was going to come after him because of his
particular situation.  And I told him exactly what to say and do to fight
the IRS in court.
 Within a year of my telling him what to say and do, Steve received his
summons to fed Civil Court.  He was facing a number of charges, with back
taxes, penalties and interest amounting to $152,000.  Steve showed up in
court and defended himself.  The District Attorney made his opening
statement, using about 20 minutes and leaving the entire courtroom believing
that Steve would spend the next several lifetimes in jail.  Then Steve stood
up to make his opening statement.  He followed my recommendation to the
letter.  This was Steve's opening statement (to the best of my memory):
"Your Honor, the District Attorney has claimed that I have not filed tax
returns or paid income taxes in several years.  Your Honor, he is correct. I
have not.  And I have not for a reason.  It is my understanding, after
studying the income tax laws extensively, that the tax laws do not require
me, an individual American Citizen not engaged in any revenue-taxable
activity, to file a return or to pay income taxes.  The District Attorney
has claimed that I am required, have not, and therefore owe a large amount
of money.  Well, Your Honor, Rule 301 of the Rules of Evidence for Federal
Courts require that the prosecution prove all points of the indictment,
including all assumptions.  The district attorney has not proven that I am
one required to file a return or to pay income taxes.  But, Your Honor, I am
willing to give the District Attorney the chance to prove his assumptions."
 And then Steve sat down and shut up. Six hours later Steve left the court
room a free man without paying $152,000 in back taxes, penalties and
 Over the years I have reviewed many court cases where the individual was
challenged by the IRS.  Some of these cases have resulted in the IRS winning
and some have resulted in the IRS losing.  Most of the time where the IRS
loses, the judge locks up the records so no one can find out anything about
the case.  But I have obtained some of these transcripts in spite of the
legal black-out.  Where the individual's defense had weaknesses resulting in
defeat, I reviewed where and why they failed.  As a result, I have refined
and improved my approach to IRS cases.  But it is still a simple 3 step
approach -- 1) I have not filed or paid, 2) I am not one required to file or
to pay; 3) the prosecution has not proved that I am required to file or to
pay.  I have challenged the IRS to pursue me as I have not filed or paid
since 1990.  But, alas, the IRS has drastically reduced the number of cases
where they pursue individuals in court.  Possibly because they have lost so
many cases over the past 5 years.
 Anyway, here sits a court case just waiting to happen, all alone, without
any attention from the IRS at all.  If you want to check out an actual
transcript from a case where the IRS lost (and the judge locked up all
records), you can review the case of Lloyd
Long on my web site.  There is a summary of the case and then the actual
transcript.  Both will provide great insight into the workings of the fed
govt and its attempt to separate you from your money.  If you read it and
want my comments, please feel free to ask.  Just thought you might want to
know. Yours in freedom, Dave Miner.
 Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2001 13:21:46 -0500 >Subject: It is now illegal to pay
Federal Income Taxes...  Reading the Patriot act revealed a stunning
Catch-22.  It's a crime, under the Patriot Act, to give funds to any
organization which is, or has, given money to a known terrorist or terrorist
supporting group, even if you don't know you did it. Well, the Taliban is
listed as a Terrorist Supporting group now by
our government.  And, the U.S. Government has given them millions of
dollars, thus making the Feds one of those criminal organizations
supporting terrorists.  Which means, if you pay your taxes, you're a
criminal. Gotta call the IRS about this. What fun. B.Livingston,4-02.
 "Can you name one government reform that actually improved anything? How
many times has Social Security been reformed? How about public education?
Health care? Let's not forget the IRS! In Washington, 'reform' always means
more spending, more taxes, more regulations, more bureaucrats, and less
freedom."      ~Rep. Ron Paul~
 We have a Constitution and our Bill of Rights (the first 10 amendments)
that makes us free.  Right?  Then visit:      Http://
Then take a look at these sites:

NOTE # 1: This is the SIXTH doc in a string of about 37 regarding the Income
Tax, How it was illegally forced upon us, the collusion of various nation
banks, including The Bank of England, the Banks of Europe, the Banks of the
USA that make up the Non-Government organization known as the Fed and the
bankers themselves dedicated to making this a Socialist Nation. As David
Rockefeller reportedly said in 1973 when he and others formed the Trilateral
Commission, "We will have this a Socialist Nation by the end of the year
2000."  Well, with the help of our past Communist President, he damned well
nearly did it.  If Comrade Gore had been elected, it would be now! The last
doc in this series is a plan that was presented to President Bush when he
visited Florida recently.  It was put directly into his hands.  He has not
acted upon it. We The People must initiate a campaign of letters, faxes,
e-mails, and phone calls to him and others in our otherwise corrupt
government letting them know of our displeasure.  For God and Country, Chet.

NOTE # 2:  [  Should you wish to be removed from my mailing list, please
send a message with the word remove in the subject line.  If you got this
from a mail list, such as  or something like that,
then it is up to the moderator or owner of the list to remove my access
based upon complaints of my material, abuse, or removal of your access if
you request it. ]         Should you wish a copy of a numbered message
(this is the Sixth one)   that you may have missed, please e-mail me off net
for a copy of it and I will be very happy to provide it. Chet.

 You may forward this to every member of Congress by using a Mail Blaster
application available on the Internet as follows:
Step 1.  Access your web browser.   Step 2.  Type in the search block:
Step 3.  Click on   Send Batch E-Mail which is on the left end of the
Step 4.  Type in your E-mail Address.   Step 5.  Click on Subject: Type in
the subject of your document.
Step 6.  Click on Message: Now here you can type in your message or you can
paste a previously copied file here.  You can also edit your message after
you finish with the message and before sending it.
Step 7.  Then click on   select a file.  Here you may click on:
 demhouse.txt (Socialist Democrat House Members) or,
 democsen.txt (Socialist Democrats Senate Members) or,
 newsorg.txt (Many of the "anchor" news folks have their email address here
for you to use) or,
 rephouse.txt (Republican House of Representatives Members) or,
 repubsen.txt (Republican Senate Members) or,
 senators.txt (All Senators).
Step 8.  After selecting the group to receive your message then click on
send batch. It will go to everyone listed in the batch.
Remember: Nothing beats a letter AND a phone call.
Chester L McWhorter Sr, c/o 504 N. Brighton Rd, Lecanto, Occupied Florida.
C. S. A. 34461. Ph: 352-344-9073. Fax: Same. E-mail:

 06 of 37 100.0.3   End.

Quote:  We are on the verge of a global transformation.  All we [ the CFR ]
need is the right major crisis and the nation[s] will accept the New World
Order.  End Quote.  David Rockefeller: Founder and Honorary Chairman,
Council of the Americas; Chairman, Americas Society; Founder, Forum of the
Americas; Chairman, Emeritus, Council on Foreign Relations [CFR]; Founder
and Honorary Chairman, Trilateral Commission [TC]; Chairman, The
Bilderbergs.  [ How does the 11 Sept 2001 attack upon our country figure
into this?  CLMsr ]



Part 7

<Back The Bankruptcy of the United States

American Patriot Friends Network APFN

"...a network of net workers..."

APFN Contents Page:Click Here

Message Board

APFN Home Page

Hit Counter